Myosin Va (myoV) and myosin VI (myoVI) are processive molecular motors that transport cargo in opposite directions on actin tracks. Because these motors may bind to the same cargo in vivo, we developed an in vitro "tug of war" to characterize the stepping dynamics of single quantum-dot-labeled myoV and myoVI motors linked to a common cargo. MyoV dominates its myoVI partner 79% of the time. Regardless of which motor wins, its stepping rate slows due to the resistive load of the losing motor (myoV, 2.1 pN; myoVI, 1.4 pN). Interestingly, the losing motor steps backward in synchrony with the winning motor. With ADP present, myoVI acts as an anchor to prevent myoV from stepping forward. This model system emphasizes the physical communication between opposing motors bound to a common cargo and highlights the potential for modulating this interaction by changes in the cell's ionic milieu.intracellular transport | motility assay | processivity | single molecule biophysics I ntracellular cargo transport relies on at least two classes of myosin molecular motors to navigate the actin cytoskeleton. Class V (myoV) and class VI (myoVI) myosins are double-headed motors that transport cargo in opposite directions along polarized actin filament tracks (1, 2). These motors convert the energy of ATP hydrolysis into force and motion and in doing so step processively on actin in a hand-over-hand fashion. With the plusends of actin filaments oriented toward the cell periphery, myoV transport contributes to exocytosis, whereas myoVI transport is critical to endocytosis (1, 2). Ensembles of molecular motors share the responsibility for transporting a single vesicle. For example, approximately 60 myoV motors coat a melanosome, although a smaller number is likely to be engaged with the track at any given time (3). Transport can also be bidirectional when oppositely directed motors are operative, as for axonal transport by the microtubule-based motors, kinesin and dynein (4, 5). With myoV and myoVI colocalizing to organelles (6, 7), these motors may engage in a virtual tug of war. If so, how do these oppositely directed myosin motors mechanically interact so that cargo is efficiently delivered to its destination?Individual motors within a transport ensemble may coordinate, cooperate, or mechanically impede one another, but determining by which mode they operate is complicated by the cargo geometry, the number and directionality of engaged motors, and the physical challenges presented by the dense actin cytoskeleton. Therefore, investigators have designed in vitro experiments to limit the number of coupled motors so that mechanistic modeling efforts were tractable (8-11). For these models, the velocity and direction of cargo transport generated by ensembles of antagonistic motors depended solely on the relative number of motors pulling in either direction (12, 13). The mechanical interactions between motors and the resultant stepping dynamics of each motor within the ensemble were beyond the predictive capacity of these models. Therefore, ...