2001
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.2.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver: accuracy of ultrasonography in transplant patients.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of ultrasonography in the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules in patients with liver cirrhosis. Pretransplantation sonograms in 52 patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation were evaluated retrospectively. The numbers of hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules were assessed in the explanted liver specimens and compared with pretransplantation ultrasonographic results. Eighteen hepatocellu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
81
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this is at the pessimistic end of the range of available evidence, it should not be seen as an outlying estimate. Every study that has used an optimal reference standard (explant pathology) to investigate the diagnostic capabilities of US, in this setting, has reported disappointing sensitivity for the tumours p2 cm in diameter: 13.8% (Kim et al, 2001), 22.2% (Rode et al, 2001) and 30.0% (Liu et al, 2003). Even if one was to adopt the most positive estimate available, all robust evidence suggests that US is less sensitive than AFP assay for the detection of the smallest tumours.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this is at the pessimistic end of the range of available evidence, it should not be seen as an outlying estimate. Every study that has used an optimal reference standard (explant pathology) to investigate the diagnostic capabilities of US, in this setting, has reported disappointing sensitivity for the tumours p2 cm in diameter: 13.8% (Kim et al, 2001), 22.2% (Rode et al, 2001) and 30.0% (Liu et al, 2003). Even if one was to adopt the most positive estimate available, all robust evidence suggests that US is less sensitive than AFP assay for the detection of the smallest tumours.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…False-positive results are less pervasive: the same studies report specificities in the range 92-98%. [256][257][258][259][260][261][262] There is good evidence that larger lesions are more reliably identified on ultrasonography. In Bennett and co-workers' study, sensitivities for the detection of HCCs of diameter greater than 5 cm, 3-5 cm, 2-3 cm, 1-2 cm and less than 1 cm were 75%, 50%, 20%, 13.6% and 0%, respectively.…”
Section: Ultrasonographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we wanted to determine the accuracy of imaging techniques as they are performed in routine daily practice in our academic tertiary-care medical center, not in the specific setting of a study in which the radiologist most likely would unintentionally have taken more time and effort to interpret imaging results. Retrospective (re)interpretation of results of imaging examinations by one or more radiologists 19,21,30 includes a similar bias that most likely would lead to greater accuracy than is the case in routine daily practice.…”
Section: Imaging Reports and Radiological-pathological Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%