2000
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.38.9.3388-3393.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 DNA in Consecutive Genital Samples Does Not Always Represent Persistent Infection as Determined by Molecular Variant Analysis

Abstract: Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection of the uterine cervix is a risk factor for progression to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Detection in consecutive genital samples of HPV-16 DNA, a frequently encountered HPV type, may represent persistent infection or reinfection. We undertook a study using PCR–single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis and sequencing of PCR products (PCR-sequencing) to determine if consecutive HPV-16-positive samples contained the same HPV-16 variant. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple infections by HPV-16 molecular variants were detected in approximately 10% of the cases. Similar frequencies of coinfection by different variants in cancer samples have been described by others [Mayrand et al, 2000;Pérez-Gallego et al, 2001]. However in cervical smears from asymptomatic women this event was reported to be rare [Sichero et al, 2007a].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Multiple infections by HPV-16 molecular variants were detected in approximately 10% of the cases. Similar frequencies of coinfection by different variants in cancer samples have been described by others [Mayrand et al, 2000;Pérez-Gallego et al, 2001]. However in cervical smears from asymptomatic women this event was reported to be rare [Sichero et al, 2007a].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…There is evidence by molecular variant analysis that detection of HPV 16 DNA in consecutive samples obtained at 6-month intervals does not always represent infection that persisted in that period [13]. This supports the second possibility above.…”
Section: Transient Infection Between V M and V M+1 That Clears Aftersupporting
confidence: 62%
“…One of the first studies to explore genomic diversity of HPV types was actually initiated to distinguish between natural HPV infections and PCR contaminations 11. Subsequent studies utilized the genomic variation seen in HPV‐16 to differentiate persistent infections from de novo infection with another HPV‐16 variant 31, 32. Comparison of HPV‐16 infections in couples confirmed the efficient sexual exchange of variants, but also identified cases where the most conspicuous lesions of sexual partners contained different HPV‐16 genomes, inferring either inefficient transmission of virus or, more likely, inefficient pathogenesis after transmission of virus from one partner to the other 33.…”
Section: Genomic Variation As a Tool In Etiological Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%