1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971025)81:5<299::aid-cncr8>3.0.co;2-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of hyperdiploid malignant cells in body cavity effusions by fluorescence in Situ hybridization on thinPrep slides

Abstract: BACKGROUND Benign body cavity effusions sometimes cannot be distinguished from malignant ones by conventional cytology. The authors performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on ThinPrep slides using chromosome specific probes to see if hyperdiploid malignant cells could be detected in 20 body cavity effusions. The results were then compared with those of conventional cytology. METHODS A total of 20 body cavity effusions from 19 patients were studied using conventional cytology and FISH. Probes specif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[25][26][27] Certainly, it is true that ThinPrep processing offers certain advantages over conventional techniques, such as clearing of obscuring background inflammation to allow for more rapid screening and the ability to make multiple slides for purposes of immunocytochemistry and molecular cytology. 28,29 The increased occurrence, however, of poor cellular preservation in ThinPrep-processed slides relative to conventionally prepared slides, observed in the present study, often resulted in a blurring of the nuclear details (Figs. 1, 2) important for the interpretation of specimens such as thyroid and breast FNAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…[25][26][27] Certainly, it is true that ThinPrep processing offers certain advantages over conventional techniques, such as clearing of obscuring background inflammation to allow for more rapid screening and the ability to make multiple slides for purposes of immunocytochemistry and molecular cytology. 28,29 The increased occurrence, however, of poor cellular preservation in ThinPrep-processed slides relative to conventionally prepared slides, observed in the present study, often resulted in a blurring of the nuclear details (Figs. 1, 2) important for the interpretation of specimens such as thyroid and breast FNAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…By using an interphase-FISH technique, specific genetic aberrations have been reported in effusion samples of different patient groups with malignant and non-malignant. 12,[18][19][20][21][22] In current study, in order to detect chromosome aneuploidies in 14 patients with non-malignant and 18 patients with malignant we used an interphase-FISH technique on cytologic specimens. Both malignant and non-malignant patients showed significant chromosomes 9 and 11 aneuploidies when compared with their controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The morphology of the nuclei was taken into consideration. Around 10 to 100 cells were evaluated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The application of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) as an adjunct to conventional cytology in diagnosing malignant diseases has been reported. [16][17][18][19][20][21] These studies take advantage of the fact that, although normal cells are usually diploid, many of the common malignant tumours harbour numerical chromosomal abnormalities that can be detected by FISH. Most of these chromosome in situ hybridisation (CISH) studies use fluorescence for visualisation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%