1992
DOI: 10.1159/000236189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of IgG Subclasses with Anti-lgE Activity in Patients with Atopic Diseases

Abstract: Significantly increased levels of IgG anti-IgE were seen in atopic patients as compared with controls. A correlation was observed between the levels of anti-IgE autoantibodies and serum IgE in the groups of atopic patients studied. No significant correlation was found between IgG anti-IgE levels and severity of the disease or between IgG subclasses with anti-IgE activity and clinical status. Analysis of IgG subclasses with anti-IgE activity showed that IgG1 and IgG4 were clearly factors in differentiating the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further demonstrate that IgG a-E Ab in randomly collected cord se ra may belong to all four IgG subclasses although with dif ferent prevalences. This is in accordance with several stud ies among adults [13][14][15][16] However, in most previous serological studies on IgG and IgG subclass a-E Ab, the crucial difference between IS and NIS a-E Ab has not been taken into consideration [6,8], inferring cautiousness in their interpretation. Although, the contribution of NIS a-E Ab may vary depending on assay conditions and on heterogeneities, e.g.…”
Section: Calibrationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We further demonstrate that IgG a-E Ab in randomly collected cord se ra may belong to all four IgG subclasses although with dif ferent prevalences. This is in accordance with several stud ies among adults [13][14][15][16] However, in most previous serological studies on IgG and IgG subclass a-E Ab, the crucial difference between IS and NIS a-E Ab has not been taken into consideration [6,8], inferring cautiousness in their interpretation. Although, the contribution of NIS a-E Ab may vary depending on assay conditions and on heterogeneities, e.g.…”
Section: Calibrationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In general, the measurement of IgG4 to food allergens has no diagnostic value, because such antibodies are so commonly found in the general population. However, when a strong IgG4 immune response to such an antigen is associated with a strong Th2‐biased autoantibody response (such as IgG4 autoantibodies to IgE 49,50 ) immunopathology might potentially ensue. An example where this might occur is the IgG4‐associated skin disease pemphigus foliaceus 51 or perhaps even in systemic lupus erythematosus 52 …”
Section: Biological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most groups have used immunological assays based on xenogeneic anti-IgE antibodies [7][8][9][10][11][12], However, it is difficult to decide whether an antibody has pan-specificity for multiple immunoglobulin classes or whether the anti-IgE antibody recognizes variable do mains and thus represents an anti-idiotypic antibody [10]. Rheumatoid factors, e.g., may also interfere with the im munological assays used for the detection of anti-IgE au toantibodies because sera can usually not be highly diluted for detection.…”
Section: Difficulties In Determination Of Anti-lge Autoantibodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%