1998
DOI: 10.1128/aem.64.11.4307-4312.1998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Infectious Enteroviruses, Enterovirus Genomes, Somatic Coliphages, and Bacteroides fragilis Phages in Treated Wastewater

Abstract: In this study, three types of treated wastewater were tested for infectious enteroviruses, the enterovirus genome, somatic coliphages, and Bacteroides fragilis phages. The aim of this work was to determine whether the presence of the two types of bacteriophages or of the enterovirus genome was a good indicator of infectious enterovirus contamination. The enterovirus genome was detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Infectious enteroviruses were quantified by cell culturing (BGM cells), an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
59
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We subsequently learned that these samples had been treated, but the analyses of these samples demonstrate the ability of coliphages to survive treatment processes where faecal coliforms cannot. This observation is consistent with previous studies that have detected coliphages and viruses in treated wastewaters (for example, Gantzer et al 1998) and demonstrates the inadequacy of bacterial indicators to estimate viral pollution.…”
Section: Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We subsequently learned that these samples had been treated, but the analyses of these samples demonstrate the ability of coliphages to survive treatment processes where faecal coliforms cannot. This observation is consistent with previous studies that have detected coliphages and viruses in treated wastewaters (for example, Gantzer et al 1998) and demonstrates the inadequacy of bacterial indicators to estimate viral pollution.…”
Section: Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…CPE can be swelling, shrinking, rounding of cells to clustering or complete destruction of the monolayer (Leland and Ginocchio, 2007). This can also be done in a quantitative form and the virus can be enumerated as most probable number (MPN) (Chapron et al, 2000;Gantzer et al, 1998;Shieh et al, 2008) or tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) units (Calgua et al, 2011;Enriquez and Gerba, 1995;Jiang et al, 2004;Kok et al, 1998). MPN test involves observation of CPE in monolayers inoculated with different dilutions of viral suspension and subsequent use of MPN table or MPN software program to determine the viral counts.…”
Section: Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…FRNAPH and BFRPH have been proposed as alternative indicators of viral health risk associated with shellfish (Dore et al, 2003;Muniain-Mujika et al, 2003). Gantzer et al (1998) report a significant correlation between SOMCPH and BFRPH and the presence of enteroviruses in wastewaters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%