2012
DOI: 10.1021/ac3006445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Inflammation in Vivo by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Provides Higher Sensitivity Than Conventional Fluorescence Imaging

Abstract: The detection of inflammatory changes is a key aim for the early diagnosis and treatment of several autoimmune, infectious, and metastatic diseases. While surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) has the capability to provide noninvasive, in vivo imaging at sufficient depth to achieve this goal, this approach has not been exploited in the study of inflammation. SERS-active nanoparticles were coded with a unique Raman signal that was protected under a wide range of conditions and stimuli. To detect early-stage … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nanotags specifically targeted inflammation in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. [102] When the effectiveness of the SERS approach was directly compared with the conventional fluorescence method it was found to be significantly more sensitive. [102] Whilst the previous examples have demonstrated active in vivo disease targeting, a multi marker approach is considered to be beneficial, especially if multiple disease aspects are to be detected simultaneously.…”
Section: In Vivo Imaging and Disease Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nanotags specifically targeted inflammation in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. [102] When the effectiveness of the SERS approach was directly compared with the conventional fluorescence method it was found to be significantly more sensitive. [102] Whilst the previous examples have demonstrated active in vivo disease targeting, a multi marker approach is considered to be beneficial, especially if multiple disease aspects are to be detected simultaneously.…”
Section: In Vivo Imaging and Disease Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[102] When the effectiveness of the SERS approach was directly compared with the conventional fluorescence method it was found to be significantly more sensitive. [102] Whilst the previous examples have demonstrated active in vivo disease targeting, a multi marker approach is considered to be beneficial, especially if multiple disease aspects are to be detected simultaneously. [13] It is hoped that by analysing disease processes or even multiple different diseases it will lead to better characterisation and personalised medicine.…”
Section: In Vivo Imaging and Disease Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Examples for the successful use of the Raman labeling approach are the discrimination of different cell types, viruses, and other lab-on-a-chip applications. [4][5][6][7][8][9] Also in vivo, these SERS-active structures, such as nanorods or nanospheres, have shown the potential to discriminate these labels inside different tissues. 10,11 Gold nanoparticles have been extensively studied as potential SERS contrast agents for cancer diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, sensitivity is one of the most important factors when designing new diagnostic tests, as early detection of disease improves patients' prognoses. In terms of sensitivity, SERS measurements can be superior to fluorescence-based measurements in vivo, 109 and the former offer greater multiplexing capabilities and specificity due to the unique fingerprint spectra arising from specific molecular vibrations. Certain reporter molecules, such as DTTC, can be utilised for dual-mode imaging using both SERS and fluorescence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although passive targeting is suitable in certain in vivo applications, more commonly employed is active targeting, in which the nanoprobe is functionalized with a recognition moiety. This moiety, which may take the form of an antibody, 109 aptamer 110 or folic acid, 111 allows more sensitive detection of specific antigens in vivo. A lot of in vivo SERS-based biosensing research has focused on cancer detection, in which nanotags are functionalised with antibodies specific to antigens -such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) -that are overexpressed in tumours.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%