2014
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02877-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Intestinal Protozoa in the Clinical Laboratory

Abstract: Despite recent advances in diagnostic technology, microscopic examination of stool specimens remains central to the diagnosis of most pathogenic intestinal protozoa. Microscopy is, however, labor-intensive and requires a skilled technologist. New, highly sensitive diagnostic methods have been developed for protozoa endemic to developed countries, including Giardia lamblia (syn. G. intestinalis/G. duodenalis) and Cryptosporidium spp., using technologies that, if expanded, could effectively complement or even re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
156
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
156
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…As a scientific role stool examination by concentration method has had high efficacy than double preparation microscopically (McHardy, 2014). Low variance might be attributed to usage of sedimentation (Formal-ether technique) instead of flotation technique in current study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As a scientific role stool examination by concentration method has had high efficacy than double preparation microscopically (McHardy, 2014). Low variance might be attributed to usage of sedimentation (Formal-ether technique) instead of flotation technique in current study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Microscopic checking of stool samples for the detection of cysts, oocysts, and trophozoites continues to be the choice of the diagnostic method for many laboratories [55]; however, the method requires technical expertise, and it is laborious; it can also be insensitive when infection is on low levels. Currently, molecular methods, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are available for detecting and identifying intestinal parasites of protists, and demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity with respect to conventional methods such as microscopy [56,57].…”
Section: Molecular Identification and Subtype Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were asked to provide fresh faecal samples. Stool specimens were examined for intestinal parasites using the standard routine methods used by hospitals and microbiological laboratories for diagnosing parasites (15). A direct saline smear preparation was made and examined by light microscopy.…”
Section: Sample Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%