2016
DOI: 10.4172/2155-9864.1000340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Low Level Mixed Chimerism Using High Throughput SNP Genotyping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The to‐date laborious and time‐consuming sample handling will be further optimised by robotic platforms for faster sample processing and to reduce risks of cross‐contamination and handling errors. Additional DNA mixture detection by Chimeric ID report generation proved not to be sensitive enough to be competitive to existing flow cytofluorimetric methods; SNP panels with higher number of assays might be more effective in this regard 35–38 . Possible contamination scenarios, for example, of female athlete's urine contamination upon sexual intercourse, 39 were not part of this study but will be addressed in future investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The to‐date laborious and time‐consuming sample handling will be further optimised by robotic platforms for faster sample processing and to reduce risks of cross‐contamination and handling errors. Additional DNA mixture detection by Chimeric ID report generation proved not to be sensitive enough to be competitive to existing flow cytofluorimetric methods; SNP panels with higher number of assays might be more effective in this regard 35–38 . Possible contamination scenarios, for example, of female athlete's urine contamination upon sexual intercourse, 39 were not part of this study but will be addressed in future investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the described study, by Chimeric ID report generation proved not to be sensitive enough to be competitive to existing flow cytofluorimetric methods; SNP panels with higher number of assays might be more effective in this regard. [35][36][37][38] Possible contamination scenarios, for example, of female athlete's urine contamination upon sexual intercourse, 39 were not part of this study but will be addressed in future investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%