2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0715-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of lymph node micrometastases in patients with squamous carcinoma of the head and neck

Abstract: While the significance of large cervical node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous carcinomas is well established, the import of a finding of regional nodal micrometastases (where a micrometastasis is defined as a metastatic deposit greater than 0.2 mm and not greater than 2.0 mm in greatest dimension) or isolated tumor cells in those patients is less clearly understood. Some earlier investigators have suggested that finding micrometastases does not have an impact on prognosis; some later investi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the presence of micrometastases is clinically significant (8,(18)(19)(20). Nieuwenhuis et al found that the survival of patients with cN0 but with one or more micrometastases (detected by molecular analysis) was worse compared to patients without micrometastases (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the presence of micrometastases is clinically significant (8,(18)(19)(20). Nieuwenhuis et al found that the survival of patients with cN0 but with one or more micrometastases (detected by molecular analysis) was worse compared to patients without micrometastases (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if a lymph node is examined only by one central section, micrometastases, which are typically localized in the subcapsular sinuses of lymph nodes, are likely missed (7). For this reason, it is very difficult to diagnose micrometastases by routine histopathological examinations (6,8). Many authors state significantly increased detection rate of micrometastases by examining serial histological sections in combination with immunohistochemical or molecular procedures (5, 9-11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These diagnostic criteria do not, however, permit detection of micrometastases [19,20], which are defined as tumours of less than 2 mm at nodal sites [21]. Advances in molecular biology have improved diagnostics that were previously based on immunohistochemical procedures with a sensitivity of only 5-58% (average = 19.6%) [20]. Micrometastases are not infrequent with head and neck SCCs [19], and their reported occurrence in the oral cavity is 21.9% [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current approach to carcinomas of the maxilla is to base nodal staging on a series of clinical and radiological parameters. These diagnostic criteria do not, however, permit detection of micrometastases [19,20], which are defined as tumours of less than 2 mm at nodal sites [21]. Advances in molecular biology have improved diagnostics that were previously based on immunohistochemical procedures with a sensitivity of only 5-58% (average = 19.6%) [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to standardize the definitions of these terms, it is suggested that the same definition already in use for breast carcinomas should be applied to HNSCC, namely, micrometastases are tumor metastases that are between 0.2 mm and 2.0 mm in greatest dimension while isolated tumor cells are groups of tumor cells that are less than 0.2 mm in greatest dimension (Fig. 3); [13].…”
Section: Micrometastasesmentioning
confidence: 99%