2014
DOI: 10.1111/vox.12142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of malarial DNA in blood donors – evidence of persistent infection

Abstract: Malarial parasitaemia in healthy donors occurs, and donor malaria-risk strategies must take into account the possibility of such donors presenting. Countries not utilizing malarial antibody screening should consider carefully the collection of donations from donors previously resident in endemic countries; temporary deferral is insufficient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While transmission declined, these individuals may have harboured parasites acquired over time and maintained at low levels of parasitaemia. Chronic infections have been shown to persist for up to a decade [2932]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While transmission declined, these individuals may have harboured parasites acquired over time and maintained at low levels of parasitaemia. Chronic infections have been shown to persist for up to a decade [2932]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In England, 6 donations were positive for Plasmodium antigen in 2012, zero in Australia (antigen supplemental testing not routinely done in France). In England from 2010 to 2013, 14 (0.7%) of 1955 donations with reference serological activity were confirmed malarial DNA positive, all with residency risk and considered to be semi-immune [54]. In a US study of donors deferred for malaria risk, the Lab 21 EIA repeat reactive rate was 1.6%, but none were PCR positive [42].…”
Section: Transfusion-transmitted Infection Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be less easily detected with some assays and more likely to fall to undetectable levels over a relatively short time frame. This contrasts with the situation in donors with serological evidence of past infection whose risk is residency; in these donors, malarial antibody titres are generally higher, and antibody usually persists for extended periods (Kitchen et al, 2014). It is unlikely that antibody levels would fall to below detectable until many years after the donor has left an endemic area.…”
Section: Acute Malaria In a Repeat Blood Donormentioning
confidence: 88%