The offset between images projected onto the left and right retinae (binocular disparity) provides a powerful cue to the three-dimensional structure of the environment. It was previously shown that depth judgements are better when images comprise both light and dark features, rather than only dark or only light elements. Since Harris and Parker (1995) discovered the "mixed-polarity benefit", there has been limited evidence supporting their hypothesis that the benefit is due to separate bright and dark channels. Goncalves and Welchman (2017) observed that single-and mixed-polarity stereograms evoke different levels of positive and negative activity in a deep neural network trained on natural images to make depth judgements, which also showed the mixed-polarity benefit. Motivated by this discovery, here we seek to test the potential for changes in the balance of excitation and inhibition that are produced by viewing these stimuli. In particular, we use magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure Glx and GABA concentration in the early visual cortex of adult humans while viewing single-and mixed-polarity random-dot stereograms (RDS). We find that observers' Glx concentration is significantly higher while GABA concentration is significantly lower when viewing mixed-polarity RDS than when viewing single-polarity RDS. These results indicate that excitation and inhibition facilitate processing of single-and mixedpolarity stereograms in the early visual cortex to different extents, consistent with recent theoretical work (Goncalves & Welchman, 2017).Binocular stereopsis is one of the primary cues for three-dimensional (3D) vision. It remains an important challenge to understand how the brain combines a pair of twodimensional retinal images to support 3D perception. A clue to understanding the neural computation of binocular stereopsis may be found in the observation that depth judgements are more accurate when binocular images are composed of both light and dark features, rather than just one or the other (Harris & Parker, 1995).This 'mixed-polarity benefit' was original explained on the basis that bright and dark features are processed by separate ON and OFF channels (Harris & Parker, 1995). Such neural infrastructure would reduce the number of potential binocular matches in a mixedpolarity stimulus, i.e., a random-dot stereogram (RDS), by as much as half, simplifying the stereoscopic correspondence problem considerably. Separate of ON and OFF channels first appear at the bipolar cell level as ON and OFF ganglia (Nelson, Famiglietti, & Kolb, 1978) and are maintained at the retinal ganglion and lateral geniculate nucleus level as ON and OFF centre cells. However, the convergence of ON and OFF channels in V1 to form simple cells (Schiller, 1992) seems to contradict this as a potential explanation for the mixed-polarity benefit.Recently, Goncalves and Welchman (2017) showed that it is possible to capture the mixed-polarity benefit using a simple linear -nonlinear processing architecture that did not depend on separate ON an...