2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2023.102359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of microplastics, polymers and additives in edible muscle of swordfish (Xiphias gladius) and bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) caught in the Mediterranean Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We expected to find suspected plastic particles in the gastrointestinal tract based on previous work [62,[64][65][66][67], similar to researchers who have studied intentional/selective [68,69] and unintentional [70] ingestion. Observations of particles in muscle tissue were also not surprising based on previous studies in wild-caught fish from the Persian Gulf [71,72], India [73], and the Mediterranean Sea [74], as well as experimental evidence by [75], who demonstrated in juvenile seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) that particles can be translocated to muscle tissue. These authors suggest that translocation to muscle tissue likely occurs via lymphatic or vascular systems, is restricted to small particle sizes, and likely explains the differences in total particle counts observed between muscle and GIT tissues [75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…We expected to find suspected plastic particles in the gastrointestinal tract based on previous work [62,[64][65][66][67], similar to researchers who have studied intentional/selective [68,69] and unintentional [70] ingestion. Observations of particles in muscle tissue were also not surprising based on previous studies in wild-caught fish from the Persian Gulf [71,72], India [73], and the Mediterranean Sea [74], as well as experimental evidence by [75], who demonstrated in juvenile seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) that particles can be translocated to muscle tissue. These authors suggest that translocation to muscle tissue likely occurs via lymphatic or vascular systems, is restricted to small particle sizes, and likely explains the differences in total particle counts observed between muscle and GIT tissues [75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…On the other hand, contamination by PS has been hypothesized, but no confirmation has been achieved due to sensitivity limitations of the pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (i.e., Py-GC/MS) [42]. PP microplastics (1.2 to 10 µm) have also been revealed in edible muscles of swordfish and bluefin tuna in concentrations of 140 to 270 and 160 to 270 number of microplastic particles kg −1 [43]. Fibrous microplastics (0.06 to 0.1 mm) have been detected in different species of wild-caught seafood.…”
Section: Fish Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the size limitations of the techniques, the qualification of smaller microplastics (<20 µm) using µ-FTIR should be reassessed (see Section 4). µ-FTIR >20 µm 0.39-7.02 mm PE, PP [20] µ-ATR-FTIR >7 µm 65-2500 µm LDPE, HDPE [21] µ-ATR-FTIR >7 µm 300-5000 µm PP, PE, PET, PS [22] µ-Raman >0.45 µm 5 to >1000 µm Rayon, PP, PES, PE [23] µ-ATR-FTIR >7 µm 23.2 µm-3.9 mm PA, PU [24] µ-FTIR >20 µm 45-100 µm HDPE, PP, PET, PS, PA [25] µ-FTIR >20 µm 3.8 µm-5.2 mm CP, PS, PA, PAR [26] SEM-EDX N/A 100-500 µm PE [27] µ-FTIR >20 µm 30 µm-3.5 mm PET, PP, PE [28] µ-FTIR >20 µm N/A PET [29] µ-FTIR >20 µm <300 µm PVC, PET, PTFE, HDPE, Nylon, ABS [30] µ-FTIR >20 µm 15.6-1151.1 µm PE [32] µ-FTIR >20 µm 5-20 µm PS, PP, PE [34] µ-Raman >0.45 µm <5 µm PET [35] µ-ATR-FTIR >7 µm N/A PES, PET, PS [42] µ-Raman >0.45 µm 1.2-10 µm PE, PET, PC [43] µ-FTIR >20 µm 0.06-0.11 mm PE, PP, PS, Nylon [44] µ-FTIR >20 µm 0.2-22 mm PE, PP [46] µ-Raman >0.45 µm 15-1175 µm PS [47] SEM/EDX N/A 100-1000 µm PET, PE [50] µ-Raman >0.45 µm <300 µm PE, PP, PET [54] µ-FTIR >20 µm 520 nm-270 µm Nylon, PET [56] µ-FTIR >20 µm 453-3885 µm Nylon, PP, HDPE [60] µ-Raman >0.45 µm N/A PE, PP, PS, PVC, PET [58] µ-Raman >0.45 µm 0.1-3 mm PA, PET, PAS [63] µ-ATR-FTIR >7 µm 24-1670 µm PES, ABS, EPM, nylon-6, CP, and viscose [51] µ-FTIR >20 µm <100 µm to 5000 µm PP, PE [52] µ-FTIR >20 µm 50-500 µm PVC, LDPE, PS, PP [57] µ-FTIR >20 µm 20-150 µm PE, PP, PS [61] µ-Raman >0.45 µm Abbreviations: Polyolefin, PO; Ethylene-propylene copolymer, EPM.…”
Section: Microplastic's Qualification: Techniques' Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ingestion of MPs by marine organisms has been reported at various levels of the trophic web, starting from zooplankton taxa that graze MPs alongside other food sources [ 13 ] to the higher trophic consumers feeding on contaminated zooplankton, such as bivalves [ 14 ] and planktivorous fish [ 15 ]. The marine trophic transfer of MPs has been empirically demonstrated from the quantification of MPs in top predators, such as tuna and swordfish [ 16 ], as well as baleen whales, that filter a wide size range from plankton up to small fish [ 17 ]. Therefore, the contamination of seafood can pose a potential threat also to human health through dietary exposure [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%