2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of moving objects in roundabouts based on a monocular system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system uses both a classification algorithm (based on Haar feature and AdaBoost) and a feature tracking algorithm that highlights moving obstacles. A similar algorithm is also developed for vehicle detection while merging a junction [26], but during the final test it was not enabled because it was not fully tested.…”
Section: A Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system uses both a classification algorithm (based on Haar feature and AdaBoost) and a feature tracking algorithm that highlights moving obstacles. A similar algorithm is also developed for vehicle detection while merging a junction [26], but during the final test it was not enabled because it was not fully tested.…”
Section: A Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the pose of the object changes, then the classical Lucas-Kanade affine tracker can be employed ( Lucas & Kanade, 1981 ). In order to obtain a tracking system that is robust to the change of shapes and viewing positions of the vehicles, the corners or points of interest of the deformable vehicular objects are determined and features such as the histograms of oriented gradients (HOGs) ( Niknejad, Takeuchi, Mita, & McAllester, 2012;Olmedo, Sastre, Bascon, & Caballero, 2013 ), the speeded up robust features (SURFs), the scale invariant feature transforms (SIFTs) ( Lu, Izumi, Teng, & Wang, 2014;Mantripragada, Trigo, Martins, & Fleury, 2013;Shi & Tomasi, 1994 ) and the binary robust invariant scalable keypoint (BRISK) features ( Hassannejad, Medici, Cardarelli, & Cerri, 2015 ) are obtained from these points. Due to the fact that the vehicles are identified and their positions are estimated using the HOG, SURF, SIFT or BRISK features generated from the points of interest only, the tracking trajectories estimated from these methods may not provide satisfactory performance for occlusions or noisy environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HV approaches for hypothesis confirmation include boosting algorithms such as AdaBoost [17,18], Support Vector Machines [19,20], or deep learning systems such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) [21], very deep CNNs [22] or region-based CNNs (R-CNN) such as Faster R-CNN [23,24] or Mask R-CNN [25]. Apart from typical two-step detectors, other techniques use e.g., pavement or lane detection for ROI alignment followed by illumination variation or edge filters to verify potential object candidates [26,27], a two-stage regression procedure [28] or the combination of appearance-based HG and motion-based HV with Haar-like features and AdaBoost [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%