2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-0987-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of mycoplasma in contaminated mammalian cell culture using FTIR microspectroscopy

Abstract: Mycoplasma contamination represents a significant problem to the culture of mammalian cells used for research as it can cause disastrous effects on eukaryotic cells by altering cellular parameters leading to unreliable experimental results. Mycoplasma cells are very small bacteria therefore they cannot be detected by visual inspection using a visible light microscope and, thus, can remain unnoticed in the cell cultures for long periods. The detection techniques used nowadays to reveal mycoplasma contamination … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some are based on immunological principles, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays [24,25], and some are based on microscopic techniques, including electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy [26][27][28]. Other detection methods include Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy [29], biochemical tests [30], and Gaussia luciferase-based assays [31]. All Next, we determined whether the sepharose-adherent mycoplasma could be detected by A15-1, A16-1Y, or #1J aptamers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some are based on immunological principles, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays [24,25], and some are based on microscopic techniques, including electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy [26][27][28]. Other detection methods include Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy [29], biochemical tests [30], and Gaussia luciferase-based assays [31]. All Next, we determined whether the sepharose-adherent mycoplasma could be detected by A15-1, A16-1Y, or #1J aptamers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While various methods exist for the detection of Mycoplasma contamination [13,14], probably the most frequently used ones are biochemical detection of Mycoplasma metabolism and PCR-based detection of Mycoplasma DNA. Though the biochemical detection of mycoplasma ATP generation (Mycoalert (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland)) is a quick protocol, it has certain disadvantages that should be mentioned, including requiring that reagents be reconstituted and brought to 22 °C before each measurement and requiring a luminometer for ATP detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While various methods exist for the detection of Mycoplasma contamination [13,14], probably the most frequently used ones are the biochemical detection of Mycoplasma metabolism and PCR-based detection of Mycoplasma DNA. Though the biochemical detection of mycoplasmal ATP generation (Mycoalert (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland)) is a quick protocol, it has certain disadvantages that should be mentioned, including the requirement of the reagents to be reconstituted and be brought to 22oC before each measurement, and the availability of a luminometer for ATP detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%