“…In an early multicenter trial of 85 patients with histopathological confirmation, 18 F-FDG PET exhibited a lesion-based sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 79%, whereas other imaging modalities -CT 50%, MRI 82%, SRS 25%, DMSA(V) 33%, and sestamibi 24% -were less successful [23]. However, in subsequent studies the sensitivity of 18 F-FDG PET for MTC fell to 40-60%, particularly when the value of Ct was less than 1000 pg/ml [16][17][18]45,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. Comparative studies of 18 F-FDG PET versus CT and MRI have reported a lower sensitivity for 18 F-FDG PET [49,50].…”