1998
DOI: 10.1378/chest.113.6.1526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Occult Micrometastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma by Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1 study, in which MUC1 was used as a marker, LN micrometastases were found in 6 of 10 patients. 44 In another study, RT-PCR for carcinoembryonic antigen was positive in 25% of LNs from patients who had histologic Stage I NSCLC. No mortality or recurrence data were provided by those investigators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In 1 study, in which MUC1 was used as a marker, LN micrometastases were found in 6 of 10 patients. 44 In another study, RT-PCR for carcinoembryonic antigen was positive in 25% of LNs from patients who had histologic Stage I NSCLC. No mortality or recurrence data were provided by those investigators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nevertheless, HLAIC expression in LNs was significantly higher than in tumor samples, which can be explained by an increased level of expression of HLAIC in lymphocytes, especially in patients with lung cancer. 32 We tested MUC1 mRNA detection by RT-PCR, as it has been reported by other authors to be sensitive for the detection of occult micrometastases in mediastinal LNs from resected NSCLCs: MUC1 mRNA was detected by nested RT-PCR in 37.5% 16 and 9.5% 33 of pN0 mediastinal LNs. However, when evaluating this marker on tumor samples in our study, 10 tumors (23%) were negative for MUC1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods based on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) allow analysis of the entire LN and have been demonstrated to be more sensitive than immunohistochemistry. [15][16][17] However, previous studies using molecular markers in lung cancers have been suspected to have a low specificity 18,19 or be restricted to tumors with mutant DNA. 17 Moreover, as NSCLCs present heterogeneous gene expression, the use of a single marker has been suspected to lead to false negative results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, it has been suggested that the RT-PCR method is more rapid and sensitive. 4,21,29,30 PCR methods have been reported for the detection of CEA, 21 CK19, 31 preprogrowth hormone receptor 20 and MUC1 32 from blood samples of lung cancer patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%