2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of pan-Arctic terrestrial snowmelt from QuikSCAT, 2000–2005

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
103
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
103
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The three of five day algorithm has proven accurate based on manual cross checking of observations and correspondence with estimates from earlier work, and allows the melt onset and melt refreeze end to be automatically detected for large regions such as the YRB. A similar approach was previously utilized with QuikSCAT (Quick Scatterometer) where melt onset was identified when the difference was greater than a threshold for three or more consecutive days and the intensity calculated as the accumulated decrease in radar cross section in relation to the five day mean (Wang et al, 2008). A similar threshold based passive microwave melt detection approach was previously applied successfully over a wide spatial domain in the pan-Arctic study by Tedesco et al (2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The three of five day algorithm has proven accurate based on manual cross checking of observations and correspondence with estimates from earlier work, and allows the melt onset and melt refreeze end to be automatically detected for large regions such as the YRB. A similar approach was previously utilized with QuikSCAT (Quick Scatterometer) where melt onset was identified when the difference was greater than a threshold for three or more consecutive days and the intensity calculated as the accumulated decrease in radar cross section in relation to the five day mean (Wang et al, 2008). A similar threshold based passive microwave melt detection approach was previously applied successfully over a wide spatial domain in the pan-Arctic study by Tedesco et al (2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from the QuikSCAT melt detection revealed that melt onset occurred in the middle to the end of March for boreal forest areas, increased with latitude, and was later over high elevation areas and for years with a cold spring season. Melt end dates were later over lake-rich areas and had more interannual variability than onset dates, while melt duration was longer for areas with deeper snow cover (Wang et al, 2008). An integrated pan-Arctic melt onset date dataset from active and passive microwave satellites further elucidated melt progression over various land types and determined that elevation, tree fraction and latitude largely explained mean melt onset date in the terrestrial Arctic .…”
Section: K a Semmens And J M Ramage: Recent Changes In Spring Snomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible to map snow cover using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data, but several limitations prevent their consideration for the presented study: Snow cover only becomes visible under wet snow conditions [21,26], and the temporal resolution of SAR sensors is typically too low to derive daily snow cover information for an area as big as the study region of Central Asia (11, 24, 35 days for TerraSAR-X, RADARSAT, Envisat/ASAR data, respectively). Additionally, the time series of available SAR data only ranges back until 1995 (RADARSAT).…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of the F/T state tended to focus on particular areas [8][9][10] or applications, such as reindeer husbandry [11], vegetation phenology [12,13] or hydrology [14]. There is also interest in global maps, which have been derived from passive [15], as well as active data, e.g., the Surface State Flag (SSF) [16], based on thresholding of ASCAT backscatter measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%