2017
DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2016.1267396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of recurrence in early stage endometrial cancer – the role of symptoms and routine follow-up

Abstract: Background: Considerable controversy remains as to the optimal organization of endometrial cancer follow-up. Aim: To evaluate the relationship between the way recurrence was detected and survival after treatment for endometrial cancer. Further, to identify characteristics associated with a pre-scheduled examination in women with symptomatic recurrence. Material and methods: All women with early stage endometrial cancer during [2005][2006][2007][2008][2009] were included in a population-based historical cohort … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, thorough patient education in symptoms of CR, and how to respond to symptoms, is evidently a necessity to ensure timely detection of CR (Francken et al, 2007). Patients diagnosed with CR as interval events due to symptom presentation are found to have higher educational level (Jeppesen et al, 2017). Patients diagnosed with CR as interval events due to symptom presentation are found to have higher educational level (Jeppesen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Interpretation and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, thorough patient education in symptoms of CR, and how to respond to symptoms, is evidently a necessity to ensure timely detection of CR (Francken et al, 2007). Patients diagnosed with CR as interval events due to symptom presentation are found to have higher educational level (Jeppesen et al, 2017). Patients diagnosed with CR as interval events due to symptom presentation are found to have higher educational level (Jeppesen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Interpretation and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unknown whether some women in the intervention group experienced symptoms to which they did not react, although we have no reason to suspect this. In a previous study, we concluded that women diagnosed with recurrence at an interval visit because of symptoms were more likely to have high‐risk disease and a higher educational level. Other studies have identified risk factors for delayed presentation of symptoms, including older age, lower socio‐economic status, atypical symptom types, comorbidity and lack of symptom awareness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hence, the majority of these women would never experience recurrence and it is estimated that only two in 1000 would potentially benefit from follow up . In addition, routine follow up could delay recurrence diagnosis, because patients postpone seeking help until the next scheduled visit …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the authors do not mention the fact that in women with asymptomatic recurrences only 39% had extravaginal recurrences, as stated in their earlier article, Jeppesen et al Morice et al., who included 390 women in their study, found that three out of five women with asymptomatic recurrences had a vaginal recurrence …”
mentioning
confidence: 91%