2019 6th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/codit.2019.8820639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of replay attacks in CPSs using observer-based signature compensation

Abstract: This paper presents a replay attack detection method that addresses the performance loss of watermarkingbased approaches. The proposed method injects a sinusoidal signal that affects a subset, chosen at random, of the system outputs. The presence of the signal in each one of the outputs is estimated by means of independent observers and its effect is compensated in the control loop. When a system output is affected by a replay attack, the loss of feedback of the associated observer destabilizes the signal esti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one approach, the authors have added the watermarking periodically to the control inputs and kept a balance between the improvement in the control cost and the increase in the detection delay [18]. In a different approach, the watermarking signal is added to the observations [20]- [22]. At the receiving end, the authenticity of the observations is first examined and then the watermarking signal is filtered out before using the observations in the controller.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In one approach, the authors have added the watermarking periodically to the control inputs and kept a balance between the improvement in the control cost and the increase in the detection delay [18]. In a different approach, the watermarking signal is added to the observations [20]- [22]. At the receiving end, the authenticity of the observations is first examined and then the watermarking signal is filtered out before using the observations in the controller.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the watermarking signal is filtered out, the control cost does not increase in this approach. Different kinds of watermarking signals are used in this context, such as sinusoidal [21], time-varying sinusoidal [23], random noise [22], multiplicative to the observations [20], etc. However, these methods may fail in the scenarios, where the attacker hijacks the sensor node and feeds the fake data before the addition of the watermarking.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] proposed to destabilize the difference between the estimated and measured output of the systems, while preserving the main system's stability. [22] proposed to use a sinusoidal signal with a time-varying frequency as authentication signal, which was later enhanced by [25] by introducing an observer-based compensation which decreased the performance loss usually found in other watermarkingbased methods. Notably, a few recent works have addressed also the problem of making a control system resilient against replay attacks, see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a different approach, the watermarking signal is also added or multiplied with the observations before the transmission. At the receiver, the authenticity of the observations are first checked, and then the watermarking signal is filtered out before feeding the observations to the estimator or controller [9], [10], [11], [12]. The watermarking signals for the observations could be of different types, such as sinusoidal [9], multiplicative to the observations [10], time-varying sinusoidal [11], random noise [12], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the receiver, the authenticity of the observations are first checked, and then the watermarking signal is filtered out before feeding the observations to the estimator or controller [9], [10], [11], [12]. The watermarking signals for the observations could be of different types, such as sinusoidal [9], multiplicative to the observations [10], time-varying sinusoidal [11], random noise [12], etc. Since the added watermarking signal is removed before the observations are fed to the controller, such methods do not increase the control cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%