2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of shockable ventricular cardiac arrhythmias from ECG signals using FFREWT filter-bank and deep convolutional neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The MMDCNN contains four convolutions, two max-pooling, and four dense layers for both MI detection and localization stages. The mathematical expression to compute the tth feature map for first convolution layer is given as follows [29,36]:…”
Section: Multi-channel Multi-scale Deep Convolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The MMDCNN contains four convolutions, two max-pooling, and four dense layers for both MI detection and localization stages. The mathematical expression to compute the tth feature map for first convolution layer is given as follows [29,36]:…”
Section: Multi-channel Multi-scale Deep Convolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters I and M are total number of modes and channels, respectively. Similarly, the mathematical expression for the evaluation of feature maps in other convolution layers are evaluated as follows [29,36]:…”
Section: Multi-channel Multi-scale Deep Convolutional Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In recent years, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based approaches have been used to detect ventricular arrhythmias by using ECG signals [21]. Panda et al [22] decomposed ECG signals by using fixed frequency range empirical wavelet transform (FFREWT) into various modes and input them into a novel deep CNN to detect shockable ventricular cardiac arrhythmias. The proposed approach achieved an accuracy of 99.036%, 99.800%, and 81.250% for the classification of shockable versus nonshockable, VF versus non-VF, and VT versus VF, respectively.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%