1989
DOI: 10.3109/02841858909175316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Soft-Tissue and Skeletal Infections with Ultra Low-Field (0.02 T) MR Imaging

Abstract: To evaluate the use of ultra low-field (0.02 T) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection, MR examinations with T2 weighted sequences were performed in 61 patients thought to be suffering from one of four major diagnostic categories: Soft-tissue abscesses (n=22), osteomyelitis (n=21), septic arthritis (n=9) and spondylitis (n=9). Infection was confirmed for 37 of these 61 patients. The verified abscesses, arthritis, spondylitis and acute osteomyelitis could be detected by 0.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the Tl of water is not field dependent, the Tl contrast between lesions with an increased water content and adjacent normal tissue will be improved as B 0 de creases. Low-field MR imaging has demonstrated good diagnostic capability in detection of hemato mas and infections (6). As an example, the visuali zation of a liver abscess with a T2-weighted image at 0.02 T is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Tissue Contrast and Field Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the Tl of water is not field dependent, the Tl contrast between lesions with an increased water content and adjacent normal tissue will be improved as B 0 de creases. Low-field MR imaging has demonstrated good diagnostic capability in detection of hemato mas and infections (6). As an example, the visuali zation of a liver abscess with a T2-weighted image at 0.02 T is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Tissue Contrast and Field Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR imaging has been used with success in the evaluation of musculoskeletal infections (3,4,10,18). It is especially useful in cases of osteomyelitis associated with soft-tissue infection or preexisting bone pathology because of its better ability to demonstrate anatomic details than scintigraphic methods (2,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%