2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-0968.2004.00086.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Specific IgE Antibodies to Nafamostat Mesilate as an Indication of Possible Adverse Effects of Leukocytapheresis using Nafamostat Mesilate as Anticoagulant

Abstract: The aim was to determine whether adverse effects of leukocytapheresis (LCAP) are related to nafamostat mesilate (NM) as an anticoagulant. Anti-NM IgE were detected in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who were administrated LCAP in our institute. Forty-nine patients (ulcerative colitis (UC)/Crohn's disease (CD): 30/19) were evaluated. Anti-NM IgE was measured by the ELISA method. Total IgE level and eosinophil count was tested concurrently. We retrospectively checked the presence of allergic symptoms a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such perspective, the rate of AR cannot simply be compared with other studies including all PE sessions. The AR seen in this study may reflect reactions not only to FFP but also to other components of TPE, such as anticoagulation drugs [5] and materials used in the extracorporeal circuit [6]. Our analysis cannot differentiate the cause of AR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In such perspective, the rate of AR cannot simply be compared with other studies including all PE sessions. The AR seen in this study may reflect reactions not only to FFP but also to other components of TPE, such as anticoagulation drugs [5] and materials used in the extracorporeal circuit [6]. Our analysis cannot differentiate the cause of AR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…An optimum dose of sodium heparin (2,000 units/session) as an anticoagulant was administered during both GMA and the sham procedures. Nafamostat mesilate (a common anticoagulant during leucocytapheresis in Japan) was avoided as this substance is associated with allergic reactions 8. The Sham GMA was based on the design by Sands et al,9 having the circuit blood lines without the Adacolumn itself.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nafamostat mesilate (NM) is recognized in Japan as an effective anticoagulant (15), but there is also a risk of an anaphylactic reaction triggered by anti-NM antibodies (16,17). We experienced a case of a 20-year-old female who had taken NM as an anticoagulant during two previous series of LCAP.…”
Section: T Ishihara Et Al 592mentioning
confidence: 99%