2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2006.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of sperm whale clicks based on the Teager–Kaiser energy operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
69
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach worked for spotted seatrout and silver perch that produced loud choruses well above the background noise of snapping shrimp (genera Alpheus and Synalpheus) but not for oyster toadfish, black drum, and red drum that had quieter calls and choruses. SPL analysis might be a way to detect presence or absence of fish calls but will not work as the sole feature in signal detection of specific fish species.Recent advances in automatic speech recognition have enabled the automatic analysis of bioacoustic signals originating from birds (Trifa et al 2008, Potamitis et al 2014, de Oliveira et al 2015, Ganchev et al 2015, amphibians (Acevedo et al 2009), terrestrial mammals (Parsons 2001, Dylla et al 2013, Zeppelzauer et al 2015, and marine mammals (Kandia & Stylianou 2006, Helble et al 2012, Pace et al 2012, Baumann-Pickering et al 2013. However, there are not many studies where signal detectors have been created to detect fish acoustic signals, especially successful ones that can identify fish calling amidst a noisy background.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach worked for spotted seatrout and silver perch that produced loud choruses well above the background noise of snapping shrimp (genera Alpheus and Synalpheus) but not for oyster toadfish, black drum, and red drum that had quieter calls and choruses. SPL analysis might be a way to detect presence or absence of fish calls but will not work as the sole feature in signal detection of specific fish species.Recent advances in automatic speech recognition have enabled the automatic analysis of bioacoustic signals originating from birds (Trifa et al 2008, Potamitis et al 2014, de Oliveira et al 2015, Ganchev et al 2015, amphibians (Acevedo et al 2009), terrestrial mammals (Parsons 2001, Dylla et al 2013, Zeppelzauer et al 2015, and marine mammals (Kandia & Stylianou 2006, Helble et al 2012, Pace et al 2012, Baumann-Pickering et al 2013. However, there are not many studies where signal detectors have been created to detect fish acoustic signals, especially successful ones that can identify fish calling amidst a noisy background.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we use the Teager-Kaiser (TK) energy operator Kandia & Stylianou (2006) on the discrete data:…”
Section: Teager-kaiser-mallat Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where w(n) is a random gaussian process Kandia & Stylianou (2006). The output is dominated by the clicks energy.…”
Section: Teager-kaiser-mallat Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, signal samples are squared and heuristics or distributional metrics are used to determine the beginning and ending energy. As described later, we use a technique based upon the Teager energy operator which is similar to that proposed by Kandia and Stylianou (2006). Once the click is identified, typical features include the peak frequency, 3 dB bandwidth, inter-click intervals, etc.…”
Section: 21: Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%