2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of subsurface voids in concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) structure using percussion approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liqiong Zheng et al used Melfrequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) as the features of percussion-induced acoustics, and support vector machine (SVM)-based machine learning was utilized to classify results [26]. Dongdong Chen et al used power spectrum density (PSD) to process percussive sound, and a decision tree machine (DTM) learning approach was used to classify results [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liqiong Zheng et al used Melfrequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) as the features of percussion-induced acoustics, and support vector machine (SVM)-based machine learning was utilized to classify results [26]. Dongdong Chen et al used power spectrum density (PSD) to process percussive sound, and a decision tree machine (DTM) learning approach was used to classify results [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhu Ziqiang [44] studied the attenuation characteristics of ultrasonic waves in concrete. Chen Dongdong [45] studied the power spectrum characteristics of ultrasonic wave propagation in concrete. Lin Weizheng [46] studied the thickness of cement concrete with the ultrasonic detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e experiments indicated that when the thickness of the steel plate is greater than 6 mm or the sizes of the defects are small, the void defects cannot be detected using this method [26,27]. e impact acoustic method is widely studied and applied in the Japanese engineering field [28], but the method cannot distinguish between small gaps and void defects [29][30][31]. In actual engineering applications, the detection accuracy of the impact acoustic method is generally 60%-70%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%