2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-3364-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of suspicious interactions of spiking covariates in methylation data

Abstract: Background: In methylation analyses like epigenome-wide association studies, a high amount of biomarkers is tested for an association between the measured continuous outcome and different covariates. In the case of a continuous covariate like smoking pack years (SPY), a measure of lifetime exposure to tobacco toxins, a spike at zero can occur. Hence, all non-smokers are generating a peak at zero, while the smoking patients are distributed over the other SPY values. Additionally, the spike might also occur on t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many neural models have been proposed for event extraction and have shown to produce better results than traditional feature-based models (e.g. Li et al , 2013 ; Miwa et al , 2012 ; Yan and Wong, 2020 ); however, most efforts have been dedicated to extracting flat events on flat entities in general domain (e.g. Liu et al , 2018 ; Nguyen et al , 2016 ; Nguyen and Nguyen, 2019 ; Sha et al , 2018 ; Yang and Mitchell, 2016 ), rather than nested entities ( Ju et al , 2018 ; Katiyar and Cardie, 2018 ; Sohrab and Miwa, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many neural models have been proposed for event extraction and have shown to produce better results than traditional feature-based models (e.g. Li et al , 2013 ; Miwa et al , 2012 ; Yan and Wong, 2020 ); however, most efforts have been dedicated to extracting flat events on flat entities in general domain (e.g. Liu et al , 2018 ; Nguyen et al , 2016 ; Nguyen and Nguyen, 2019 ; Sha et al , 2018 ; Yang and Mitchell, 2016 ), rather than nested entities ( Ju et al , 2018 ; Katiyar and Cardie, 2018 ; Sohrab and Miwa, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%