2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2620-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of the Bacterial Potato Pathogens Pectobacterium and Dickeya spp. Using Conventional and Real-Time PCR

Abstract: Blackleg and soft rot of potato, caused by Pectobacterium and Dickeya spp., are major production constraints in many potato-growing regions of the world. Despite advances in our understanding of the causative organisms, disease epidemiology, and control, blackleg remains the principal cause of down-grading and rejection of potato seed in classification schemes across Northern Europe and many other parts of the world. Although symptom recognition is relatively straightforward and is applied universally in seed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, 200 μl of homogenate suspension was transferred into 1,800 μl PEB (0.32 g/l of MgSO 4 , 1.08 g/l of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , 1.08 g/l of K 2 HPO 4 , and 1.7 g/l of sodium polypectate) liquid medium (Perombelon and Van Der Wolf, 2002; Czajkowski et al, 2010) and incubation was continued under the same conditions for 48 h. The bacterial culture was centrifuged to collect bacteria for total DNA extraction using the HiPure Bacterial DNA Kit (Magen, China). The presence of the Pcc pathogen was detected through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the following two Pcc -specific primers: EXPCCF (5′-GAA CTT CGC ACC GCC GAC CTT CTA-3′) and EXPCCR (5′-GCC GTA ATT GCC TAC CTG CTT AAG-3′) as previously described (Kang et al, 2003; Humphris et al, 2015). Data were analyzed using the Chi-squared test ( p < 0.05).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, 200 μl of homogenate suspension was transferred into 1,800 μl PEB (0.32 g/l of MgSO 4 , 1.08 g/l of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , 1.08 g/l of K 2 HPO 4 , and 1.7 g/l of sodium polypectate) liquid medium (Perombelon and Van Der Wolf, 2002; Czajkowski et al, 2010) and incubation was continued under the same conditions for 48 h. The bacterial culture was centrifuged to collect bacteria for total DNA extraction using the HiPure Bacterial DNA Kit (Magen, China). The presence of the Pcc pathogen was detected through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the following two Pcc -specific primers: EXPCCF (5′-GAA CTT CGC ACC GCC GAC CTT CTA-3′) and EXPCCR (5′-GCC GTA ATT GCC TAC CTG CTT AAG-3′) as previously described (Kang et al, 2003; Humphris et al, 2015). Data were analyzed using the Chi-squared test ( p < 0.05).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of methods have been suggested for the identification and differentiation of SRP (reviewed in [12,13]). Pat has been detected by means of conventional PCR [14][15][16][17] and loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification (LAMP) [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there are not sufficiently effective protocols for mass treatment, one of the best agro-technical approaches is to reject the infected plants. For all these reasons, timely detecting P. atrosepticum is crucial to effectively protect plants and produce potato seed tubers [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%