2017
DOI: 10.17221/52/2017-vetmed
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of the desiccant and plant growth regulator chlormequat in honeybees and comb pollen

Abstract: AbstrAct:We here describe the results of the investigation of a honeybee hive that exhibited symptoms of poisoning in the July 2013. During the summer, only a few pesticides such as desiccants, typically quaternary ammonium (quat) and glyphosate formulations, are applied. We therefore analysed samples of not only a wide range of pesticides, but also desiccants. Additionally, we analysed dying honeybees, already dead individuals and comb pollen from the case hive. The LC-MS/MS (triple quadrupole) analysis of gl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agricultural production, we should not only pay attention to the effects of PGRs on plants, but also the toxicity and residue of PGRs. At present, the main methods for detecting PGR residues are high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography (GC) and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) [13][14][15]. However, the pretreatment processes of these methods are complicated, and the detection efficiency is low [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agricultural production, we should not only pay attention to the effects of PGRs on plants, but also the toxicity and residue of PGRs. At present, the main methods for detecting PGR residues are high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography (GC) and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) [13][14][15]. However, the pretreatment processes of these methods are complicated, and the detection efficiency is low [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%