2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Trichinella spiralis DNA in mouse faeces during the early stage of infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several real-time PCR assays targeting different genes for specific detection of T. spiralis DNA have been described. Previous developed specific assays for T. spiralis detection were applied to the study of wild life samples (Atterby et al 2009;Cuttel et al 2012) or to the study of experimental models (Golab et al 2009;Li et al 2010). Guenter et al developed a real-time PCR methodology for T. spiralis, Trichinella britovi and Trichinella psedospiralis DNA detection in domestic pigs infected which showed a sensitivity of 0.1 LPG (Guenther et al 2008); but there is not background about specific T. spiralis real-time PCR performed on muscle samples derived to the diagnostic laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several real-time PCR assays targeting different genes for specific detection of T. spiralis DNA have been described. Previous developed specific assays for T. spiralis detection were applied to the study of wild life samples (Atterby et al 2009;Cuttel et al 2012) or to the study of experimental models (Golab et al 2009;Li et al 2010). Guenter et al developed a real-time PCR methodology for T. spiralis, Trichinella britovi and Trichinella psedospiralis DNA detection in domestic pigs infected which showed a sensitivity of 0.1 LPG (Guenther et al 2008); but there is not background about specific T. spiralis real-time PCR performed on muscle samples derived to the diagnostic laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the limitations of conventional and serological methods, several molecular techniques, i.e., conventional PCR (cPCR) (Dick et al 1992, Wu et al 1998, Golab et al 2009, Wang et al 2012, random amplified polymorphic DNA-PCR (Bandi et al 1995), PCR-based single-strand conformation polymorphism (Gasser et al 1998), PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (Wu et al 1999(Wu et al , 2007, and multiplex PCR (Zarlenga et al 1999, Borsuk et al 2003, have been developed to detect and diagnose Trichinella infection. Presently, real-time PCR is becoming more widely used for routine diagnostic purposes because it is accurate, sensitive, and fast, allowing the rapid quantitative analysis of a specific DNA in a biological sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To develop the faecal DNA extraction protocol a QIAamp® DNA stool mini kit was used on faeces from mice infected with T . muris nematodes to see if an eDNA signal could be detected, using nematode species specific primers from the literature [ 33 , 34 ]. When the manufacturer’s protocol was followed there was no successful amplification from faecal extracted DNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%