2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2018.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of unique Ebola virus oligonucleotides using fluorescently-labeled phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligonucleotide probe pairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, RNA and DNA probes require high ionic strength conditions to shield their intermolecular repulsive force for hybridisations [ 136 ]. However, PMO probes have no net charge and they are insensitive to the ionic strength of the buffer, so they can retain their excellent binding affinity to target nucleic acid under the condition of low or high ionic strength [ 137 ].…”
Section: Strategies To Enhance the Biosensor Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, RNA and DNA probes require high ionic strength conditions to shield their intermolecular repulsive force for hybridisations [ 136 ]. However, PMO probes have no net charge and they are insensitive to the ionic strength of the buffer, so they can retain their excellent binding affinity to target nucleic acid under the condition of low or high ionic strength [ 137 ].…”
Section: Strategies To Enhance the Biosensor Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the LOD of 238 UO 2 + was estimated. The normalized intensities of the m/z + 270 peak of multiple data points acquired from all samples were used in the linear regression fitting to derive the LOD 23,24 . The LOD of 238 UO 2 + in liquid ToF‐SIMS was calculated based on LOD = 3 * std.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the observations regarding mismatched targets are interpreted as the ability of the sensor to distinguish one- or two-mismatch oligos from the target. Under circumstances, when the analyte is extremely pure, and its concentration is known, such ability can be indeed used to discriminate a ‘mutant’ nucleic acid sequence from the ‘wild-type’ [ 13 , 41 ]. However, when it comes to specifically detecting a target biomarker species from an entire community of bacteria, this ‘ability’ can prove to be less advantageous.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth noticing that while in the sequential scenario, a biotin–streptavidin binding takes place, which is a fast and extremely high-affinity process (K d on the order of ≈10 −14 mol/L), in the case of the capture approach, a morpholino–DNA hybridization must occur in order for the bead to become bound. While morpholino–DNA hybridization is still a high affinity binding process, the dissociation constants (K d ) of this reaction were found to be over 3 orders of magnitude higher, on the order of 10 −10 mol/L (0.18 ± 0.02 nM for a 25-nucleotide tetramethyl rhodamine labeled morpholino probe and 0.31 ± 0.04 nM for a 25-nucleotide Alexa488 labeled morpholino probe) in a solution containing 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5) and 1 mM EDTA [ 41 ]. The same authors also determined hybridization rates of the morpholino probes to the target DNA in high salt (150 mM NaCl, similar to the DPBS-T buffer used in this study) and in low salt (5 mM NaCl) buffers and found that the rate was three times higher in the low salt ((15 ± 2) × 10 5 M −1 ·s −1 ) in comparison to the high salt ((4.8 ± 0.5) × 10 5 M −1 ·s −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%