2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of viable Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef by propidium monoazide real-time PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Spearman's rank correlation, the viable ratios measured through PMA-qPCR significantly correlated with those measured based on the culturable ratios (r D 1; p < 0.01) but not with those measured by qPCR (r D 0.6; p D 0.29). These observations show that qPCR-based viable ratios are higher than those measured by PMA-qPCR or culture assays (Liu and Mustapha 2014). The gradual decline in the viable ratio observed in conjunction with the decreasing controlled viable samples, as measured using qPCR, could be related to membrane protein degradation caused by heating, which in turn, could lead to DNA damage (Masters et al 1998).…”
Section: Comparison Of Culturable or Viable Ratios Asmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Spearman's rank correlation, the viable ratios measured through PMA-qPCR significantly correlated with those measured based on the culturable ratios (r D 1; p < 0.01) but not with those measured by qPCR (r D 0.6; p D 0.29). These observations show that qPCR-based viable ratios are higher than those measured by PMA-qPCR or culture assays (Liu and Mustapha 2014). The gradual decline in the viable ratio observed in conjunction with the decreasing controlled viable samples, as measured using qPCR, could be related to membrane protein degradation caused by heating, which in turn, could lead to DNA damage (Masters et al 1998).…”
Section: Comparison Of Culturable or Viable Ratios Asmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The optimal light exposure time for the PMAqPCR assay varied from those reported in previously published studies. In general, 2-10 min of light exposure has typically been used to detect viable bacteria or viruses (Nocker et al 2006(Nocker et al , 2007Kobayashi et al 2009b;Parshionikar et al 2010;Liu and Mustapha 2014). Therefore, the optimal light exposure time for DNA amplification may vary and depend on the light source and bacterial species used (Liu and Mustapha 2014).…”
Section: Effect Of Light Exposure Times On Pma-qpcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the concentration and/or pre-enrichment steps are necessary for most food and water samples to reach the detection limit because food and water usually contain lower level of pathogens; and iv) PCR assays cannot be employed to differentiate between viable and dead bacteria. Due to amplification of DNA from both viable and dead cells within samples, PCR and qPCR assays may lead to overestimation of target cells [53] or may get false-positive results, resulting in unnecessary product recalls and economic losses [54]. Figure 1 shows the presumptive procedure of PCR/qPCR used for detection and identification of Salmonella in food and water [29].…”
Section: Pcr and Quantitative Real-time Pcr (Qpcr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overestimation may lead to unnecessary product recalls and economic losses [54]. Several methods have been developed for detection of viable foodborne pathogens, including reversetranscriptase PCR (RT-PCR) [94], qPCR assays with biological dyes [33] and commercially available dead/live bacteria viability test kits (Live/Dead ® BacLight ™ Bacterial Viability Kit, Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR).…”
Section: Detection Of Viable Bacteria In Food and Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propidium monoazide (PMA)-real-time PCR based on DNA has been proposed to be a good way to avoid amplification of DNA isolated from dead cells (20). Unfortunately, PMA becomes increasingly toxic at higher concentrations and is very expensive; PMA-real-time PCR methods that include higher PMA concentrations are considered to be counterproductive and cost prohibitive (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%