2010
DOI: 10.3109/09638280903171543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of warning surfaces in pedestrian environments: The importance for blind people of kerbs, depth, and structure of tactile surfaces

Abstract: The probability among pedestrians with blindness to detect a tactile surface is not higher if the design solution has a kerb. This study also confirms the complexity of being a blind pedestrian in the traffic environment. The results can be used for evidence-based physical planning. The study also has implications for development of more efficient vision rehabilitation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings suggest that the EyeCane can be used both as a primary and as a secondary mobility aid, thus providing upper-body protection while enabling each user to choose their personally preferred setup in general, and for specific tasks and situations. For instance, using the EyeCane mounted on the white-cane when walking outside, enables its users to detect tactile differences in ground surfaces (Øvstedal, Lindland, & Lid, 2005; A Ståhl, Almen, & Wemme, 2004; Agneta Ståhl, Newman, Dahlin-Ivanoff, Almén, & Iwarsson, 2010) and is reliable (Dakopoulos & Bourbakis, 2010), while providing additional upper-body protection. As H.B stated, after participating in the experiment; “ when not focused while walking, I am vulnerable to bumps from various waist-up obstacles such as branches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings suggest that the EyeCane can be used both as a primary and as a secondary mobility aid, thus providing upper-body protection while enabling each user to choose their personally preferred setup in general, and for specific tasks and situations. For instance, using the EyeCane mounted on the white-cane when walking outside, enables its users to detect tactile differences in ground surfaces (Øvstedal, Lindland, & Lid, 2005; A Ståhl, Almen, & Wemme, 2004; Agneta Ståhl, Newman, Dahlin-Ivanoff, Almén, & Iwarsson, 2010) and is reliable (Dakopoulos & Bourbakis, 2010), while providing additional upper-body protection. As H.B stated, after participating in the experiment; “ when not focused while walking, I am vulnerable to bumps from various waist-up obstacles such as branches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known from existing research (e.g. Demirkan, 2013) that there are complexities in detecting tactile surfaces in the real world; and that in a sample of eight blind pedestrians who were cane users involved in a study to assess detectability in a real-world experiment (Stahl et al, 2010) the white cane was reported in 61% of cases, feet in 18%, sound in 8% and 13% did not know. The participants in this study also 'stressed that habits and training improve the skills to detect warning surfaces' (Stahl et al, 2010: p. 478).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Regarding the detectability of warning surfaces for blind pedestrians, a study by Stahl et al (2010) compared a range of physical parameters. The study involved 12 participating blind pedestrians who were experienced at navigating pedestrian environments using a long white cane.…”
Section: Pavements Kerbs and Surface Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%