2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2013.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of zinc and lead in water using evaporative preconcentration and single-particle laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained curve is then subtracted from the trace metal and background spectra. Compared with our previous approach, the limits of detection obtained using the EDB-LIBS method were clearly lower despite the significantly smaller solid angle for plasma emission collection; only 2.8 % of the angle used in reference [12]. The EDB-LIBS technique also consumes less energy due to the absence of the oven for water evaporation.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The obtained curve is then subtracted from the trace metal and background spectra. Compared with our previous approach, the limits of detection obtained using the EDB-LIBS method were clearly lower despite the significantly smaller solid angle for plasma emission collection; only 2.8 % of the angle used in reference [12]. The EDB-LIBS technique also consumes less energy due to the absence of the oven for water evaporation.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The time-averaged plasma excitation temperature during the detection time window of each 30 single-shots was estimated using the Boltzmann plot method and the suitable emission lines of nickel between 338 nm and 362 nm. The excitation temperature was found to be 5400 K on average with a standard deviation of 730 K. Earlier, we have shown that the trace metal analysis from monodisperse sodium chloride particles yields a linear calibration curve [12]. Because the standard error of the mean of 30 signals is only 2.6 %, we can estimate the limits of detection of the EDB-LIBS technique with a good certainty using simply the averaged signal obtained from the 5 ppm solution.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations