1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91036-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection rates for abnormal cervical smears: what are we screening for?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
62
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It may look too radical since only 1% of women with CIN I are estimated to progress to invasive cervical cancer (Holowaty et al, 1999). In addition, identifying women with abnormal cervical changes put such women under stress that they are at a risk of developing cervical cancer, when in fact majority of them never develop the disease (Raffle et al, 1995). The presence of telomerase activity in the whole range of cervical samples from mild dysplasia to stage IV cancers suggests that telomerase is activated early and play an essential role during cervical carcinogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may look too radical since only 1% of women with CIN I are estimated to progress to invasive cervical cancer (Holowaty et al, 1999). In addition, identifying women with abnormal cervical changes put such women under stress that they are at a risk of developing cervical cancer, when in fact majority of them never develop the disease (Raffle et al, 1995). The presence of telomerase activity in the whole range of cervical samples from mild dysplasia to stage IV cancers suggests that telomerase is activated early and play an essential role during cervical carcinogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, for example, the suspected suboptimal performance of screening in the UK in the 1990s (Raffle et al, 1995;Anonymous, 1998) may have contributed to the high relative risks reported in that period (Sasieni et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various diagnostic programs are available for HPV identification in different countries such as by using the traditional detection based on the Papanicolaou smear discovered in 1943. However, false negatives (between 15-50% for cervical premalignant lesions and cervical cancer) and false positives (30%) should be considered during screening by using that cytological technique Cuzick et al, 2003).Cytology examinations have limitations with regards to specificity and low predictive value for high grade pathology (Shafi 1994;Raffle et al, 1995). Highly sensitive methods have been developed to detect HPV such as: polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method; and is considered the most sensitive HPV detection technique worldwide (Young et al, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%