Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave 2020
DOI: 10.1117/12.2562978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detector fabrication development for the LiteBIRD satellite mission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed descriptions, including important systematics of sinuous antennas, can be found in previous reports. 1,16 We chose this technology for the LFT and MFT as its broadband nature is well suited to cover the frequency ranges required by LiteBIRD. For this application we describe the specific antenna used to fabricate a LF-4 prototype as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Sinuous Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Detailed descriptions, including important systematics of sinuous antennas, can be found in previous reports. 1,16 We chose this technology for the LFT and MFT as its broadband nature is well suited to cover the frequency ranges required by LiteBIRD. For this application we describe the specific antenna used to fabricate a LF-4 prototype as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Sinuous Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard fabrication flow of sinuous antenna bolometers at MNL UC Berkeley is well described in previous technology development papers for LiteBIRD. 11,16 These proceedings describes the initial 'pre-processing' fabrication steps we took to coat the back side of the wafers with palladium for cosmic ray mitigation.…”
Section: Device Wafer Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning measurement noise, the described technique relies upon coherent detection of the received signal [27], where the (complex) waveform is preserved, after frequency down-conversion to complex baseband, for further post-processing (correlation between fundamental and high order mode), as opposed to non-coherent detection where only the power of the incoming signal is detected. The implication is that state-of-the-art non-coherent detectors with ultimate noise performance like Superconducting Transition Edge Sensor (TES) bolometers (planned for LiteBIRD [28]) or emerging Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detector (MKID) technology [29], are not applicable to the presented approach. Coherent and non-coherent detection might be not mutually exclusive, because non coherent detection of the fundamental signal and coherent correlation of fundamental and high order mode may co-exist on different paths, however the practical feasibility of such architecture is not verified in this account.…”
Section: Implementation Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we present the system we have developed for an initial assessment of the magnetic field sensitivity of an AlMn TES prototype. The prototype tested for this paper came from an early fabrication run and does not fully meet LiteBIRD specifications, in particular we measured T c ∼ 220 mK and P sat ∼ 4 pW, while T c ∼ 170 mK and P sat ∼ 1 pW are the target 23,24 (more design and measured parameters of the TES tested are reported in Table 1). Nevertheless, we decided to report these results given the scarcity of data about TES magnetic field sensitivity in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%