2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep16212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deterioration of the coercivity due to the diffusion induced interface layer in hard/soft multilayers

Abstract: Hard/soft permanent magnets have aroused many interests in the past two decades because of their potential in achieving giant energy products as well as their rich variety of magnetic behaviors. Nevertheless, the experimental energy products are much smaller than the theoretical ones due to the much smaller coercivity measured in the experiments. In this paper, the deterioration of the coercivity due to the interface atomic diffusion is demonstrated based on a three dimensional (3D) micromagnetic software (OOM… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that, by increasing the reverse field, the soft phase domain walls move toward the interface between the soft and hard phases and exceed into the hard phase and cause magnetization reverse to that phase. Therefore, the coercivity of the samples decreases in comparison to the hard phase region [40,41]. Considering the small size and proximity of hard-soft phases (Figure 2), it is possible that the volume fraction of the hard phase is enough to exert exchange force on magnetization in a soft grain of SFO, thus preventing the magnetization in soft grains from reversal with the applied field reversal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that, by increasing the reverse field, the soft phase domain walls move toward the interface between the soft and hard phases and exceed into the hard phase and cause magnetization reverse to that phase. Therefore, the coercivity of the samples decreases in comparison to the hard phase region [40,41]. Considering the small size and proximity of hard-soft phases (Figure 2), it is possible that the volume fraction of the hard phase is enough to exert exchange force on magnetization in a soft grain of SFO, thus preventing the magnetization in soft grains from reversal with the applied field reversal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To produce and stabilize skyrmions, the film should be ultrathin and the interface should be flat enough. There should be very limited atomic diffusion and defects in the system 29,30 , so that the DMI level can be kept to stabilize the skyrmions. In comparison, many bulk magnetic materials with acentric structures, such as MnSi 2 , FeGe 31 , Cu 2 OSeO 3 8 , and GaV 4 S 8 32 , have been found having DMI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above formula is consistent with that derived by Zhao et al . 30 , 31 and Pellicelli et al . 26 for the nucleation field at the case K int = 0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…( 10 ) for various values of layer thickness. The parameters for the calculation are shown in Table 1 31 . Nd 2 Fe 14 B is selected as the hard phase because it is the best permanent magnet so far with the largest reported energy product due to its high values for both the crystalline anisotropy and the spontaneous magnetization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%