2018
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201815005042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinant Factors for Managing Innovation in the Malaysian Public Sector

Abstract: Abstract. Since 1991, the government has started the forces to encourage public sector to innovate in order to strengthen the capability and solve problems at workplace for the benefit of organization and its people. The focuses of this forces is to create value creation, encourage cost reduction, and provide services that meet aspirations and people's expectations through high impact ideas. However, to achieve these focuses, public sector faces few challenges that affect the management of innovation; which in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to a lack of qualitative studies, this study uses a qualitative research design to achieve the research objectives like the approach adopted by Ab Rahman and Ismail (2018) and Zanko et al. (2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to a lack of qualitative studies, this study uses a qualitative research design to achieve the research objectives like the approach adopted by Ab Rahman and Ismail (2018) and Zanko et al. (2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ab Ab Rahman and Ismail (2018) studied three factors contributing to innovation management in the Malaysian public sector: leadership skills, innovative culture and reward system. The interviews results suggested that, in the organization, an employee, especially a leader, should commit fully to the innovative culture.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant amount of study has focused on examining the elements that contribute to innovative behavior in the workplace, to enhance our understanding of this phenomenon (De Jong & Den Hartog, 2010;Yuan & Woodman, 2010;Bos-Nehles et al, 2017;Sulistiawan et al, 2017;Ab Rahman & Ismail, 2018;Bawuro et al, 2018;Riaz et al, 2018;Aishah Hashim et al, 2019;Bin Saripin & Kassim, 2019;Purc & Lagun, 2019;Saraih et al, 2019;Siregar et al, 2019;Widodo, 2020;Contreras et al, 2020;Hashim, 2021;Hosseini & Haghighi Shirazi, 2021;. However, the findings are still insufficient and conclusive due to different regions, industries and cultures.…”
Section: Messmann and Mulder (2012)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A inovação é fundamental para administração pública (Bysted & Jespersen, 2013;Hughes et al, 2011;Moussa et al, 2018;OCDE, 2015;Sørensen, 2016;Vries et al, 2018) uma vez que é um mecanismo que proporciona oportunidades de melhorias contínuas na prestação de serviços públicos à sociedade, a qual tem sido cada vez mais exigente com a qualidade, celeridade e com a transparência. Tem-se que um setor público inovador pode proporcionar uma relação mais eficaz com a sociedade, por meio da oferta de produtos e serviços com maior qualidade, uma vez que a inovação permite a resolução de problemas de novas formas (Brandão & Bruno-Faria, 2013;Rahman & Ismail, 2018;Sørensen, 2016). Bos-Nehles et al (2017) consideram o comportamento dos colaboradores como um dos aspectos centrais da inovação, uma vez que os indivíduos são a base de toda a inovação.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified