2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/focs.2017.90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinant-Preserving Sparsification of SDDM Matrices with Applications to Counting and Sampling Spanning Trees

Abstract: We show variants of spectral sparsification routines can preserve the total spanning tree counts of graphs, which by Kirchhoff's matrix-tree theorem, is equivalent to determinant of a graph Laplacian minor, or equivalently, of any SDDM matrix. Our analyses utilizes this combinatorial connection to bridge between statistical leverage scores / effective resistances and the analysis of random graphs by [Janson, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing '94]. This leads to a routine that in quadratic time, sparsifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Random spanning trees. Algorithms for sampling random spanning trees have a long history, but only recently have they explicitly used matrix concentration [DKP + 17, DPPR17,Sch18]. The matrix concentration arguments in these papers, however, deal mostly with how modifying a graph results in changes to the distribution of random spanning trees in the graph.…”
Section: Establishes a Related Results For K-homogeneousmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Random spanning trees. Algorithms for sampling random spanning trees have a long history, but only recently have they explicitly used matrix concentration [DKP + 17, DPPR17,Sch18]. The matrix concentration arguments in these papers, however, deal mostly with how modifying a graph results in changes to the distribution of random spanning trees in the graph.…”
Section: Establishes a Related Results For K-homogeneousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms for sampling of random spanning trees have been studied extensively, [Gue83, Bro89, Ald90, Kul90, Wil96, CMN96, KM09, MST15, HX16, DKP + 17, DPPR17,Sch18], and a random spanning tree can now be sampled in almost linear time [Sch18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to other randomized graph sparsification algorithms [67,37,2,19,34], our sampling scheme directly interacts with Chernoff bounds. Our random matrices are 'groups' of edges related to random walks starting from the edge e. We will utilize Theorem 1.1 due to [71], which we paraphrase in our notion of approximations.…”
Section: B Proofs About Schur Complementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectral sparsifiers have found numerous applications in graph algorithms -they are a crucial component of several fast solvers for Laplacian linear systems (this was the main objective of Spielman and Teng) [ST04, ST14, KMP14,KMP11]. Additionally, they are the only graph theoretic primitive in some of them [PS14, KLP + 16], such as faster cut and flow algorithms [She13, She09, CKM + 11], sampling random spanning trees [DKP + 17], estimating determinants [DPPR17], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%