Determinants and impacts of subcontracting: evidence from India’s unorganized manufacturing sector

Abstract

There are two divergent perspectives on the impact of subcontracting on firms in the informal sector. According to the benign view, formal sector firms prefer linkages with relatively modern firms in the informal sector, and subcontracting enables capital accumulation and technological improvement in the latter. According to the exploitation view, formal sector firms extract surplus from stagnant, asset-poor informal sector firms that use cheap family labour in homebased production. However, direct, firm-level evidence on the determinants and impact of subcontracting is thus far lacking in the literature. We apply a modified Heckman selection model to Indian National Sample Survey data on informal manufacturing enterprises (2005)(2006). We find that home-based, relatively asset-poor, and female-owned firms are more likely to be in a subcontracting relationship. Further, we perform selectivity-corrected Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition and calculate treatment effects to show that subcontracting benefits smaller firms, firms in industrially backward states and rural firms; it is harmful for larger firms, firms in industrially advanced states, and urban firms. Our results suggest that the effects of subcontracting are more complex than those predicted by the divergent perspectives. Policy-makers need to engage with this complexity.

Self-employed or Paid Employed: Who can Earn more among the Slum Dwellers and Why?

“…Again, the Indian patriarchal society may also be responsible for this gap where the females are mostly engaged in household chores. The vulnerable conditions of the female-headed enterprises in India due to patriarchal socio-economic relations are also mentioned in the past studies (Basole et al, 2015; Raj and Sen, 2016). Moreover, the employer may prefer male workers over female workers due to the need for physical strength to work as a wage employee.…”

Possibilities of Transformation: The Informal Sector in India

“…Table 1 shows the stark difference between the characteristics of the OAMEs and establishments, that is, between the noncapitalist and the capitalist enterprises, respectively. It has been widely reported in the literature that some favorable characteristics that aid a firm to grow over time include location outside the household (giving better access to market) and registration of the enterprise (strengthening property rights and helping to secure loans and government aid), while female-headed enterprises are more vulnerable due to patriarchal socioeconomic relations (Raj and Sen 2016; Basole et al 2015; and Bhattacharya et al 2013). It is seen that the OAMEs have remained markedly and consistently worse-off compared with the establishments in terms of these characteristics.…”

Improving Production Efficiency through Subcontracting and Unorganized Indian Textile and Garment Enterprises: An Impact Evaluation

“…This group of writings predicts a retarding impact on the growth potential of informal units as the asymmetric bargaining power of the informal firm will result in appropriation of the surplus generated in production by the formal sector enterprise (Mehrotra andBiggeri 2007, Moser 1978). Utilizing the unit-level NSS data on firmcharacteristics Basole, Basu and Bhattacharya (2014) demonstrated that the debate cannot be settled clearly in favour of one argument or the other. The impact of subcontracting on subcontracted firm's productivity will rather greatly vary across firms classified by different organizational characteristics (ibid.).…”