2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants and implications of mRNA poly(A) tail size – Does this protein make my tail look big?

Abstract: While the phenomenon of polyadenylation has been well-studied, the dynamics of poly(A) tail size and its impact on transcript function and cell biology are less well-appreciated. The goal of this review is to encourage readers to view the poly(A) tail as a dynamic, changeable aspect of a transcript rather than a simple static entity that marks the 3′ end of an mRNA. This could open up new angles of regulation in the post-transcriptional control of gene expression throughout development, differentiation and can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
101
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(163 reference statements)
0
101
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After nuclear export, poly(A) length is dynamically regulated by the interplay of 3 ′ -to-5 ′ degradation through exoribonucleases, poly(A) tail stabilization via poly(A) tail binding proteins, and elongation by cytoplasmic Poly(A)polymerases (Diez and Brawerman 1974;Clegg and Pikó 1982;Hake and Richter 1994;Mendez et al 2000;Read et al 2002). While it has been shown that the poly(A) tail has a regulatory role, it is still not fully understood whether a specific length allows for specific regulatory outcomes (Jalkanen et al 2014). A minimal poly(A) tail is needed to prevent quick 3 ′ -to-5 ′ exonuclease degradation (Ford et al 1997), yet hyperadenylated RNAs are marked for fast RNA degradation in the nucleus (Bresson and Conrad 2013;Jalkanen et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After nuclear export, poly(A) length is dynamically regulated by the interplay of 3 ′ -to-5 ′ degradation through exoribonucleases, poly(A) tail stabilization via poly(A) tail binding proteins, and elongation by cytoplasmic Poly(A)polymerases (Diez and Brawerman 1974;Clegg and Pikó 1982;Hake and Richter 1994;Mendez et al 2000;Read et al 2002). While it has been shown that the poly(A) tail has a regulatory role, it is still not fully understood whether a specific length allows for specific regulatory outcomes (Jalkanen et al 2014). A minimal poly(A) tail is needed to prevent quick 3 ′ -to-5 ′ exonuclease degradation (Ford et al 1997), yet hyperadenylated RNAs are marked for fast RNA degradation in the nucleus (Bresson and Conrad 2013;Jalkanen et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it has been shown that the poly(A) tail has a regulatory role, it is still not fully understood whether a specific length allows for specific regulatory outcomes (Jalkanen et al 2014). A minimal poly(A) tail is needed to prevent quick 3 ′ -to-5 ′ exonuclease degradation (Ford et al 1997), yet hyperadenylated RNAs are marked for fast RNA degradation in the nucleus (Bresson and Conrad 2013;Jalkanen et al 2014). Besides regulating RNA degradation, poly(A) tail length has been shown to correlate with translation efficiency during embryonic development (Beilharz and Preiss 2007;Subtelny et al 2014), possibly by favoring a closed-loop structure of the mRNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3′ end processing of most eukaryotic mRNAs is a multistep maturation involving co‐transcriptional recognition of pre‐mRNA cis ‐elements, following by cleavage of the nascent RNA and non‐templated addition of ~200 adenosine residues in human cells. These mRNA 3′ end modifications confer stability and translational efficiency to the transcripts (Bentley, ; Jalkanen, Coleman, & Wilusz, ; Proudfoot, ; Y. Shi & Manley, ). Conversely, removal of the poly(A) tail by deadenylation can signal mRNA decay and/or translational repression of poly(A) + transcripts (Aström, Aström, & Virtanen, ; Mayya & Duchaine, ; Nicholson & Pasquinelli, ; Webster et al, ; Yi et al, ; X. Zhang, Kleiman, & Devany, ).These modifications in the 3′ end are controlled by cis ‐acting elements present in the mRNA and trans ‐acting regulatory factors, such as RNA binding proteins (RBPs) and RNAs with complementary base‐pairing, such as, but not restricted to, microRNAs (miRNAs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essential that the 3′ end of virtually all eukaryotic RNA polymerase II transcripts is being processed and forming mature polyadenylated mRNA. The polyadenylation signal is located approximately 10–30 nucleotides upstream of the poly(A) addition site in most mRNAs; the poly(A) tails are indispensable structural and functional elements of eukaryotic mRNAs, and they are also crucial for the regulation of mRNA stability . In the HIV‐1 genome, the HIV‐1 poly(A) site can fold into a stable stem‐loop structure, which is highly conserved among different simian and human immunodeficiency viruses .…”
Section: Functions Of Rna Conformational Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%