2008
DOI: 10.1002/job.555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants and performance effects of the allocation of ownership rights in consulting firms

Abstract: SummaryThis paper provides a joint assessment of the antecedents and the performance consequences of the allocation of ownership rights in professional service firms (PSFs). Drawing on established economic theory, we argue that the efficiency implications of alternative ownership arrangements drive the allocation of ownership rights. We test our arguments using a sample of 119 large and medium-sized consulting firms. The results confirm the significance of capital requirements, service standardization, busines… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(123 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate, first consider the situation where the professionals retain all ownership rights. Here, the costs of reduced diversification and a limited investment base are best countered by the adoption of the lower cost, less formal, exploratory MCS (Richter & Schroder, 2008). Alternatively, when ownership is opened to outsiders, the higher cost of the more formal, boundary MCS is offset by both the ability of the outside owners to diversify and the greater access to capital.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To illustrate, first consider the situation where the professionals retain all ownership rights. Here, the costs of reduced diversification and a limited investment base are best countered by the adoption of the lower cost, less formal, exploratory MCS (Richter & Schroder, 2008). Alternatively, when ownership is opened to outsiders, the higher cost of the more formal, boundary MCS is offset by both the ability of the outside owners to diversify and the greater access to capital.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…4 3 There is some evidence of clustering of ownership structures. In a professional services setting, Richter and Schroder (2008) find size, service standardisation, capital requirements and risk to be determinants of ownership, and conclude that it is a combination of these factors that determines the optimal allocation of ownership rights. There are two provisos.…”
Section: Primary Healthcarementioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations