2006
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants for receiving acupuncture for LBP and associated treatments: a prospective cohort study

Abstract: Background: Acupuncture is a frequently used but controversial adjunct to the treatment of chronic low back pain (LBP). Acupuncture is now considered to be effective for chronic LBP and health care systems are pressured to make a decision whether or not acupuncture should be covered. It has been suggested that providing such services might reduce the use of other health care services. Therefore, we explored factors associated with acupuncture treatment for LBP and the relation of acupuncture with other health … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only four studies had small sample sizes and were conducted in clinical settings [60,61,66,67]. Of the large sample-sized studies, 8 were conducted in clinical settings [30,43,[62][63][64][65]68,69] and the remaining 18 were population-based studies [26,29,42,44,45,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Only four studies had small sample sizes and were conducted in clinical settings [60,61,66,67]. Of the large sample-sized studies, 8 were conducted in clinical settings [30,43,[62][63][64][65]68,69] and the remaining 18 were population-based studies [26,29,42,44,45,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies using nationally representative samples reported exclusive CAM use (use of CAM alone for back pain by participants who did not seek conventional medical care) as ranging from 1.7% to 20.5% (mean: 8%; median: 2%) [42,47,50]. Among the other studies with large (but not nationally representative) samples, the prevalence rates of use of CAM for back pain ranged from 11.4% to 69% (mean: 29.4%; median: 28%) [30,[43][44][45]49,62,68]. Although some other studies with large samples reported on the prevalence of CAM use, they either combined back and neck pain together as a single questionnaire item or considered back pain within the broad category of musculoskeletal pain and as such did not allow extraction of prevalence rates specifically for back pain [48,54,55,57,65].…”
Section: Prevalence Of Cam Usementioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations