2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2006.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of annual fluxes of CO2 and N2O in long-term no-tillage and conventional tillage systems in northern France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
117
0
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
14
117
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is probably related to several aspects: the presence of easily decomposable soybean residues on the soil surface, higher WFPS values (Figure 1a), higher stocks of labile soil organic carbon (Campos, 2006) and higher microbial biomass in NT compared to CT, as reported previously at the same experimental site (Fabrizzi et al, 2008). The higher soil CO 2 -C flux under NT compared to CT, especially at sites under longstanding no-tillage systems, have been reported elsewhere (Yamulki & Jarvis, 2002;Campos, 2006;Liu et al, 2006;Oorts et al, 2007). This could be related to an improvement in soil quality and biomass input potential in the conservation system, compared to conventional systems (Amado et al, 2007).…”
Section: Soil Co 2 -C Fluxsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This result is probably related to several aspects: the presence of easily decomposable soybean residues on the soil surface, higher WFPS values (Figure 1a), higher stocks of labile soil organic carbon (Campos, 2006) and higher microbial biomass in NT compared to CT, as reported previously at the same experimental site (Fabrizzi et al, 2008). The higher soil CO 2 -C flux under NT compared to CT, especially at sites under longstanding no-tillage systems, have been reported elsewhere (Yamulki & Jarvis, 2002;Campos, 2006;Liu et al, 2006;Oorts et al, 2007). This could be related to an improvement in soil quality and biomass input potential in the conservation system, compared to conventional systems (Amado et al, 2007).…”
Section: Soil Co 2 -C Fluxsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Soil respiration is the result of complex interactions between biotic and abiotic factors [8]. Excessive tillage, burning of crop residues, application of large amounts of fertilizers or changes in soil-air-water relation lead to higher CO 2 emissions into the atmosphere and reduction of soil carbon content [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, some researchers have shown higher emissions under NT relative to tilled plots attributed to decomposition of old surface residues (Oorts et al, 2007;Soane et al, 2012). Recently, some researchers have used no-till emission and its exponential decay in time as a reference to estimate CO 2 emission after tillage (La Scala et al, 2008, 2009; by subtracting the CO 2 emission after tillage from the no-till emission, it is possible to estimate the effect of tillage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%