2015
DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2015-2-009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of bank social responsibility: case of Croatia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if an information relates to several activities, it counts more times (for each disclosure item separately). Proceeding in this way, based on previous research findings (Branco & Rodriguez, 2006;Hinson, et al, 2010;Grudic Kvasic, et al, 2016), a CSR index was obtained. It should be noted that the described system does not necessarily reflect the quality of CSR activities, but their frequency in the four CSR categories specified in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if an information relates to several activities, it counts more times (for each disclosure item separately). Proceeding in this way, based on previous research findings (Branco & Rodriguez, 2006;Hinson, et al, 2010;Grudic Kvasic, et al, 2016), a CSR index was obtained. It should be noted that the described system does not necessarily reflect the quality of CSR activities, but their frequency in the four CSR categories specified in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive association between profitability and CSR disclosure can be accredited to the point that profitable firms have more investment in CSR actives and legitimize them. Other studies show an adverse association between CSR disclosure and financial performance (Hernaus and Stojanovic, 2015;Hirigoyen and Poulain-Rehm, 2014). While others show no connection between CSR disclosure and financial performance (Adeneye and Ahmed, 2015).…”
Section: Profitabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some countries have shown great improvements such as Australia and India (Ameeta et al, 2015); German (Relano & Paulet, 2012); USA (Charles et al, 2014); New Zealand (Dobbs & Staden, 2016). On the other hand, others are still striving to advance their disclosure such as Libya (John & Adel Abdulhamid, 2009); Romania (Mocan et al, 2015); Malaysia (Abdifatah Ahmed, 2013); Malawi (Lipunga, 2013); Croatia (Hernaus & Stojanovic, 2015); Bangladesh (Md. Hafij & Mohammad Afjalur, 2015) as well as Egypt (Rizk et al, 2008;, Hussainey et al, 2011;Soliman et al, 2013;Arafa & ElHawary, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Boubkri et al 2016find that cross-listing has a positive effect on the CSR disclosure in countries with weaker institutions, lower country-level sustainability, and higher liability of foreignness, and for those operating in industries with high litigation risk. In Croatia, the CSR disclosure level for foreign banks operating in Croatia surpasses the disclosure by the domestic banks (Hernaus & Stojanovic, 2015). Another study in Korea, reveals that foreign block shareholders may act as effective external monitors as they have a negative moderate effect on the control-ownership effect on the CSR disclosure (Sul et al, 2014).…”
Section: Foreign Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%