1991
DOI: 10.1016/0169-6009(91)90050-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of bone mineral content in childhood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This close relationship between bone mass and anthropometric variables had already been identified in early studies by Mazess and Cameron (22) and was later confirmed in studies performed on bone from the appendicular bone structures (19,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28) and from the lumbar spine (10,11,15,16,29,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This close relationship between bone mass and anthropometric variables had already been identified in early studies by Mazess and Cameron (22) and was later confirmed in studies performed on bone from the appendicular bone structures (19,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28) and from the lumbar spine (10,11,15,16,29,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Similar results have been obtained by quantitative roentgen microdensitometry [21], single photon absortiometry [6] and by DEXA [4]. However, in all circumstances the so called BD values were obtained by dividing BMC for the projected area (areal BD, mg/cm 2) which is still dependent upon bone dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Consequently, the BMD as a ‘true’ volumetric density can be determined. With this technique two measurement sites (region of interest; ROI) are used, the first ROI is at the mid‐point of the line between the distal and proximal edge of the phalanx (BMD 50% ) consisting mainly of cortical bone (approximately 80%), the second ROI is located at the proximal quarter‐point of this line (BMD 25% ), consisting mainly of trabecular bone (approximately 60%) (Trouerbach et al ., 1991). This technique has a short‐term in vivo coefficient of variance of less than 1%, being slightly better than precision figures for the other RA techniques (Yates et al ., 1995; Ravn et al ., 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%