2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of caesarean section in Egypt: evidence from the demographic and health survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
43
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
11
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of CS at the high risk unit in Mansoura University hospital remained fairly constant at a rate close to 80% throughout the study period. The rates presented in this study were higher than those available from other parts in Egypt and from many other Arab countries [9,12,13]. The high rate of CS in this study could be attributed to 4 main reasons; firstly is the lack of a dedicated obstetric anesthetic staff member to offer epidural analgesia within the labour wards, secondly the more liberal view of CS as an accepted mode of delivery by junior obstetricians, especially at the emergency unit; thirdly the observed low rate of successful VBAC (22.23%) and fourthly the absence of any evidence of attempted instrumental (forceps and ventouse) deliveries in many instances where it may have been successful.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rate of CS at the high risk unit in Mansoura University hospital remained fairly constant at a rate close to 80% throughout the study period. The rates presented in this study were higher than those available from other parts in Egypt and from many other Arab countries [9,12,13]. The high rate of CS in this study could be attributed to 4 main reasons; firstly is the lack of a dedicated obstetric anesthetic staff member to offer epidural analgesia within the labour wards, secondly the more liberal view of CS as an accepted mode of delivery by junior obstetricians, especially at the emergency unit; thirdly the observed low rate of successful VBAC (22.23%) and fourthly the absence of any evidence of attempted instrumental (forceps and ventouse) deliveries in many instances where it may have been successful.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…In Egypt [7][8][9], data on rates and indications of CS are variable based on the level of experience and on the whether the delivery was carried out at a private or a public setting. In USA [10], the caesarean delivery rate has increased by more than 10 % (from 26% to 36.5%) in a short time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported rates vary from 10% to 50%. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] There has not been any regulation by any authorities in developing countries including India. In view of the possible complications, related to previous caesarean section scar, in the subsequent deliveries, there is an urgent need for caesarean section audits by the regulatory authorities in the country.…”
Section: Discussion-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The rate of caesarean section has shown progressive rise in last three decades in most part of the world. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Proponents of increase caesarean section rate, consider it in favor of improved perinatal outcome. Developed countries like Sweden, Denmark and Netherland with lowest perinatal mortality rates still have caesarean section rate of 10 percent.…”
Section: Introduction-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in sub-Saharan Africa where coverage in healthcare service is low, initiatives to increase cesarean rates are ongoing in order to meet the millennium development goals . At the same time, there are calls for caution [Mbaye et al, 2011;Fesseha et al 2011] to prevent high unnecessary cesarean rates like those observed in many developed countries as well as some developing countries [Khawaja et al, 2004]. Stein, 20081986: 9.4% 1995: 20.3% Kenya Wanyonyi et al, 20071996: 20.4% 2001: 25.9% 2004: 38.1% Buekens et al, 2003: 4.1% 1998: 5.7% Wenjuan et al, 2011: 6.0% 2003: 4.9% 2008: 7.2% Namibia van Dillen J, 2007: 7.9% Wenjuan et al, 2011: 7.2% 2006.6% …”
Section: Cesarean Delivery Rates In Developing Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%