1997
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-006-5061-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Case Selection at Morning Report

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To determine why residents present certain cases and not others at morning report (MR) in an institution that permits residents the free choice of cases. DESIGN / PARTICIPANTS: Prospective survey of 10 secondand third-year residents assigned to the medical service. SETTING:A 241-bed teaching hospital with 55 categorical internal medicine residents. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Over a 4-week period, there were 194 admissions to the medical service on 18 call days preceding MR. Of these admissions, 30… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in association with other teaching modalities such as rounds, didactic conferences and self-directed learning, it would be a good aid for improving the residents’ and students’ knowledge in this field 3 11 12…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in association with other teaching modalities such as rounds, didactic conferences and self-directed learning, it would be a good aid for improving the residents’ and students’ knowledge in this field 3 11 12…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current literature on MR, though relatively scarce, describes the efforts that have gone into modifying and defining the organization and format [4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], leadership [3,6,20] and case selection of sessions [21]. Although several authors have emphasized the influential role of the MR in hospital medical education, expert opinions are seldom sought.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residents' contribution in leading sessions is generally regarded to be promising [10,19,20] and may improve the sessions and prevent the frustrating and hesitating tone that was once nicely described by DeGroot and Siegler [14] as ''morning distort or morning retort''. Ramratnam et al [21], however, questioned giving complete freedom to residents in selecting cases, as they reported a narrower scope of MR, because rare or unique cases were selected at the expense of common cases when it was the full responsibility of the residents. Nonetheless, Moreno and Shaffer [19] observed unstructured resident-led MRs and found that case presentations covered a broad range of topics with little duplication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In a 3-month analysis of case selection for morning report, they found that residents prefer cases that involve interesting or challenging diagnostic or treatment problems. There remains a disconnect between the basic clinical elements of the bedside examination and the "show and tell" atmosphere of morning report.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%