2001
DOI: 10.1080/09638280110061744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of chronic disability related to low back pain: Towards an integrative biopsychosocial model

Abstract: The proposed biopsychosocial model assumes that LBP-related chronic disability is possibly, in some cases, a stress-related disorder. Its empirical verification in LBP could particularly improve the understanding of the interrelationships between certain variables.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
80
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Some prognostic factors may be able to explain these differences, such as past experiences of pain 2 , lower levels of education 2 , psychological factors 9 , and fear of persistence of pain 9 . Furthermore, preliminary evidence suggests that the attitudes and beliefs of patients about low back pain are associated with therapeutic outcomes 10,11 , levels of disability and quality of life 12 . For example, patients who believe that movement will lead to worsening pain have a higher risk for the persistence of symptoms and higher levels of disability [13][14][15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some prognostic factors may be able to explain these differences, such as past experiences of pain 2 , lower levels of education 2 , psychological factors 9 , and fear of persistence of pain 9 . Furthermore, preliminary evidence suggests that the attitudes and beliefs of patients about low back pain are associated with therapeutic outcomes 10,11 , levels of disability and quality of life 12 . For example, patients who believe that movement will lead to worsening pain have a higher risk for the persistence of symptoms and higher levels of disability [13][14][15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this initial part of the diagnostic process biomedical theories are the most prevalent theories with regard to dysfunction. Physiological pathology is only found in 10 -20% of patients with low back pain [8,9]. Low back pain is referred to as nonspecific when there is no physiological cause that fully explains the back problem [10 -12].…”
Section: Theory Of Dysfunction In Low Back Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such cases, if they do not improve within 12 weeks, are referred to as chronic [9].With this change from acute to chronic, the low back problem is redefined, and consequently the range of hypotheses about the factors leading to the back problem is extended. The biomedical perspective on low back pain that guided the diagnostic process in the acute phase changes into a biopsychosocial perspective in the chronic phase [8,11,13]. Biomedical theories recede into the background, in favour of a vast field of psychosocial theories attempting to explain the persistence of the low back pain, such as treatments incorporating operant conditioning theories [14,15] and social cognitive theories [16 -20].…”
Section: Theory Of Dysfunction In Low Back Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Included in the domain of job and work environment include various aspects of job content, for example, perceived workload, monotonous work, low job control, low job satisfaction, limited social support (Truchon, 2001). Outside of work environment parameters typically include factors associated with demands and responsibilities in family situation and leisure time, and social/familial relationship and support.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outside of work environment parameters typically include factors associated with demands and responsibilities in family situation and leisure time, and social/familial relationship and support. Finally, individual factors are generally of two types corresponding to: (1) sociodemographic factors, for example, age, social class, culture, educational status; life style (smoking) and (2) psychological factors, for example, affective variables (anxiety and depression), personality traits, cognitive variables (fear avoidance and life satisfaction) and coping strategies (catastrophizing) (Pincus et al, 2002a;Truchon, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%