2010
DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-0667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
31
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Eosinophil counts of sputum were higher in ECRS patients than in non-ECRS patients when only patients without asthma were tested (data not shown). Consistent with previous reports [12,13], all of these findings suggest that ECRS but not non-ECRS patients had lower airway inflammation. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Eosinophil counts of sputum were higher in ECRS patients than in non-ECRS patients when only patients without asthma were tested (data not shown). Consistent with previous reports [12,13], all of these findings suggest that ECRS but not non-ECRS patients had lower airway inflammation. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our definition of CRS, which included both sinus changes and nasal polyps, may have led to the association we observed. Indeed, a recent study showed that increased FENO is more frequent in CRS with nasal polyps compared with CRS without nasal polyps . Moreover, in our study, the mean number of blood eosinophils was significantly higher for subjects with CRS than that for subjects without CRS ( P < 0.0001), even though 62% of the latter group had allergic rhinitis (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…It is well known that persistent airway inflammation may be observed also in patients with asymptomatic asthma [26] possibly leading to airway remodeling and fixed bronchial obstruction [27]. It is interesting that most of these patients have CRSwNP, comorbidity which has been related to eosinophilic airway inflammation [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%