2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determinants of Frequent Attendance in Primary Care. Study Protocol for a Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies

Abstract: Thus far, no study has systematically synthesized longitudinal studies investigating the determinants of frequent attendance in primary care. Consequently, the purpose of our systematic review is to give an overview of evidence based on longitudinal observational studies analyzing the determinants of frequent attendance. Three electronic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL) will be searched. Moreover, the reference lists of studies included in our systematic review will be searched manually. Longitudinal obse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, in this current work we used a HCU tool originally developed by Stuhldreher et al [ 18 ] and refined by Hohls et al [ 19 ]. Additional details are provided by Hajek et al [ 20 ]. It was also used in previous research (e.g., [ 17 , 19 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in this current work we used a HCU tool originally developed by Stuhldreher et al [ 18 ] and refined by Hohls et al [ 19 ]. Additional details are provided by Hajek et al [ 20 ]. It was also used in previous research (e.g., [ 17 , 19 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our systematic review is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42020178077). Moreover, a study protocol for our systematic review has recently been published ( 32 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will use an appropriate tool (i.e., HCU tool developed by Hohls et al [15]) to assess study quality. It has also been applied in recent studies [15,16]. We will apply this specific tool for reasons of clarity, applicability and succinctness.…”
Section: Assessment Of Study Quality/risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%